Literature DB >> 15731213

Using evolutionary Expectation Maximization to estimate indel rates.

Ian Holmes1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm, in the form of the Baum-Welch algorithm (for hidden Markov models) or the Inside-Outside algorithm (for stochastic context-free grammars), is a powerful way to estimate the parameters of stochastic grammars for biological sequence analysis. To use this algorithm for multiple-sequence evolutionary modelling, it would be useful to apply the EM algorithm to estimate not only the probability parameters of the stochastic grammar, but also the instantaneous mutation rates of the underlying evolutionary model (to facilitate the development of stochastic grammars based on phylogenetic trees, also known as Statistical Alignment). Recently, we showed how to do this for the point substitution component of the evolutionary process; here, we extend these results to the indel process.
RESULTS: We present an algorithm for maximum-likelihood estimation of insertion and deletion rates from multiple sequence alignments, using EM, under the single-residue indel model owing to Thorne, Kishino and Felsenstein (the 'TKF91' model). The algorithm converges extremely rapidly, gives accurate results on simulated data that are an improvement over parsimonious estimates (which are shown to underestimate the true indel rate), and gives plausible results on experimental data (coronavirus envelope domains). Owing to the algorithm's close similarity to the Baum-Welch algorithm for training hidden Markov models, it can be used in an 'unsupervised' fashion to estimate rates for unaligned sequences, or estimate several sets of rates for sequences with heterogenous rates. AVAILABILITY: Software implementing the algorithm and the benchmark is available under GPL from http://www.biowiki.org/

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15731213      PMCID: PMC7197704          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  18 in total

1.  An algorithm for statistical alignment of sequences related by a binary tree.

Authors:  J Hein
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2001

2.  Weighted neighbor joining: a likelihood-based approach to distance-based phylogeny reconstruction.

Authors:  W J Bruno; N D Socci; A L Halpern
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Assessing variability by joint sampling of alignments and mutation rates.

Authors:  D Metzler; R Fleissner; A Wakolbinger; A von Haeseler
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  An expectation maximization algorithm for training hidden substitution models.

Authors:  I Holmes; G M Rubin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Evolutionary HMMs: a Bayesian approach to multiple alignment.

Authors:  I Holmes; W J Bruno
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  A "Long Indel" model for evolutionary sequence alignment.

Authors:  I Miklós; G A Lunter; I Holmes
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Adam Siepel; David Haussler
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Sequence alignments and pair hidden Markov models using evolutionary history.

Authors:  Bjarne Knudsen; Michael M Miyamoto
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  A nucleotide substitution model with nearest-neighbour interactions.

Authors:  Gerton Lunter; Jotun Hein
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Pfam 3.1: 1313 multiple alignments and profile HMMs match the majority of proteins.

Authors:  A Bateman; E Birney; R Durbin; S R Eddy; R D Finn; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes.

Authors:  Liran Carmel; Yuri I Wolf; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Problems and solutions for estimating indel rates and length distributions.

Authors:  Reed A Cartwright
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  A novel method for protein-protein interaction site prediction using phylogenetic substitution models.

Authors:  David La; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-12

4.  Fitting Birth-Death Processes to Panel Data with Applications to Bacterial DNA Fingerprinting.

Authors:  Charles R Doss; Marc A Suchard; Ian Holmes; Midori Kato-Maeda; Vladimir N Minin
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  The genomic landscape of short insertion and deletion polymorphisms in the chicken (Gallus gallus) Genome: a high frequency of deletions in tandem duplicates.

Authors:  Mikael Brandström; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Detection of non-coding RNAs on the basis of predicted secondary structure formation free energy change.

Authors:  Andrew V Uzilov; Joshua M Keegan; David H Mathews
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Divisive hierarchical maximum likelihood clustering.

Authors:  Alok Sharma; Yosvany López; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  BigFoot: Bayesian alignment and phylogenetic footprinting with MCMC.

Authors:  Rahul Satija; Adám Novák; István Miklós; Rune Lyngsø; Jotun Hein
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Query-dependent banding (QDB) for faster RNA similarity searches.

Authors:  Eric P Nawrocki; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A macaque's-eye view of human insertions and deletions: differences in mechanisms.

Authors:  Erika M Kvikstad; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.