Literature DB >> 15731005

Changing chromatin dynamics and nuclear organization during differentiation in Drosophila larval tissue.

Rajika Thakar1, Amy K Csink.   

Abstract

Global changes in gene expression and exit from the cell cycle underlie differentiation. Therefore, understanding chromatin behavior in differentiating nuclei and late G1 is key to understanding this developmental event. A nuclear event that has been shown to specifically occur in late G1 is the association of two heterochromatic blocks in Drosophila. The brown(Dominant) (bw(D)) chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster contains a large block of heterochromatin near the end of 2R. This distal block associates with centric heterochromatin (2Rh), but not until at least 5 hours into G1. We used the bw(D) allele as a model for nuclear organization to determine whether its association with the heterochromatic compartment of the second chromosomes (2Rh) strictly requires differentiation or if this change is a stochastic event, its occurrence being proportional to time spent in G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle. Fluorescence in situ hybridization on eye imaginal discs showed increased association between the bw locus and 2Rh in differentiated cells. Interestingly, an increase in the number of nuclei showing bw(D)-2Rh association in the brains of developmentally delayed larvae that were compromised for differentiation was also observed. Live fluorescence imaging showed that the kinetics of chromatin movement remains unchanged in the developmentally arrested nuclei. These observations suggest that nuclear reorganization is not directly controlled by specific inductive signals during differentiation and that this nuclear reorganization can happen in a cell, regardless of differentiation state, that is arrested in the appropriate cell cycle stage. However, we did see changes that appear to be more directly correlated with differentiation. Dynamic imaging in eye imaginal discs showed that the movement of chromatin is more constrained in differentiated cells, implying that confinement of loci to a smaller nuclear space may help to maintain the changed organization and the transcription profile that accompanies differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15731005     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.01684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  17 in total

1.  The Differences Between Cis- and Trans-Gene Inactivation Caused by Heterochromatin in Drosophila.

Authors:  Yuriy A Abramov; Aleksei S Shatskikh; Oksana G Maksimenko; Silvia Bonaccorsi; Vladimir A Gvozdev; Sergey A Lavrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Drosophila under the lens: imaging from chromosomes to whole embryos.

Authors:  Cornelia Fritsch; Ginette Ploeger; Donna J Arndt-Jovin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Gene expression within a dynamic nuclear landscape.

Authors:  Yaron Shav-Tal; Xavier Darzacq; Robert H Singer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  Moving chromatin within the interphase nucleus-controlled transitions?

Authors:  Chien-Hui Chuang; Andrew S Belmont
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 7.727

5.  Interplay of developmentally regulated gene expression and heterochromatic silencing in trans in Drosophila.

Authors:  Brian T Sage; Michael D Wu; Amy K Csink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Analysis of chromatin structure of genes silenced by heterochromatin in trans.

Authors:  Parul Nisha; Jennifer L Plank; Amy K Csink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Dynamic Changes in Plant Nuclear Organization in Response to Environmental and Developmental Signals.

Authors:  Norman R Groves; Alecia M Biel; Anna H Newman-Griffis; Iris Meier
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Trans-inactivation: Repression in a wrong place.

Authors:  Aleksei S Shatskikh; Yuriy A Abramov; Sergey A Lavrov
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.160

9.  Insulators, not Polycomb response elements, are required for long-range interactions between Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Hua-Bing Li; Martin Müller; Ilham Anne Bahechar; Olga Kyrchanova; Katsuhito Ohno; Pavel Georgiev; Vincenzo Pirrotta
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Protein equilibration through somatic ring canals in Drosophila.

Authors:  Peter F McLean; Lynn Cooley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.