Literature DB >> 15730353

Retrospective analyses of pooled data from CREST I and CREST II trials for treatment of cocaine dependence.

Ahmed Elkashef1, Tyson H Holmes, Daniel A Bloch, Steve Shoptaw, Kyle Kampman, Malcolm S Reid, Eugene Somoza, Domenic Ciraulo, John Rotrosen, Deborah Leiderman, Ann Montgomery, Frank Vocci.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze pooled data from the Cocaine Rapid Evaluation Screening Trial (CREST). Pooling data from these small pilot trials into four major drug classes permitted data exploration for treatment and covariate effects with increased sample size.
DESIGN: Small pilot trials were conducted to screen fifteen medications as prospective treatments for cocaine dependence. Studies included a flexible 2-week to 4-week screening/baseline period followed by an 8-week randomized treatment condition. Participants were randomized equally to one of up to three active medications or placebo.
SETTING: Five Medications Development Research Units at the five academic centers of University of Cincinnati, New York University, University of Pennsylvania, University of California Los Angeles and Boston University. PARTICIPANTS: The pooled data set consisted of 357 total subjects. Standardized inclusion and exclusion criteria were employed in subject selection to enhance consistency of cocaine-dependent study participants across all sites (see reports on individual trials in this supplement for details). All participants provided at least two urine samples that were positive for cocaine metabolite during a two-week period prior to being randomized. INTERVENTION: All subjects in these trials, those randomized to placebo and active medications, received active treatment in the form of evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy. MEASURES: Quantitative urine benzoylecgonine (BE), self-report of cocaine use, and total Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS) scores were compared between each class of medication and its matched-placebo group.
FINDINGS: Regression analysis of pooled data did not identify any statistically significant differences between treatment and matched-placebo for any of the four classes. Exploration of the effects of baseline covariates indicated that gender and African American status were associated significantly with outcome. Female gender was consistently associated with poorer outcomes for medication and placebo groups, while the direction of association between African American status and outcome differed by treatment groups. Retention was also examined: dropout rates may have been somewhat higher for placebo than treatment groups during the early active-treatment period. Classification trees were used to identify characteristics of subjects who were abstinent for at least two weeks during the eight-week trial; only 4.0% of females while 17.9% of males achieved this criterion.
CONCLUSIONS: Results presented here may prove useful for planning future clinical trials for therapies targeting cocaine dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15730353     DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00986.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  14 in total

Review 1.  Psychostimulant treatment of cocaine dependence.

Authors:  John J Mariani; Frances R Levin
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2012-04-26

2.  What happens to agreement over time? A longitudinal study of self-reported substance use compared to saliva toxicological testing among subsidized housing residents.

Authors:  Alexis Rendon; Eun-Young Mun; Emily Spence-Almaguer; Scott T Walters
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2019-03-15

3.  Bupropion for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence in non-daily users: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Ann L Anderson; Shou-Hua Li; Denka Markova; Tyson H Holmes; Nora Chiang; Roberta Kahn; Jan Campbell; Daniel L Dickerson; Gantt P Galloway; William Haning; John D Roache; Christopher Stock; Ahmed M Elkashef
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 4.  Cognitive dysfunction in individuals with cocaine use disorder: Potential moderating factors and pharmacological treatments.

Authors:  James J Mahoney
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 5.  Stimulant abuse: pharmacology, cocaine, methamphetamine, treatment, attempts at pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Daniel Ciccarone
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.907

6.  Baseline neurocognitive profiles differentiate abstainers and non-abstainers in a cocaine clinical trial.

Authors:  Joy M Schmitz; Marc E Mooney; Charles E Green; Scott D Lane; Joel L Steinberg; Alan C Swann; F Gerard Moeller
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  2009-07

Review 7.  Dopamine agonists for the treatment of cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Silvia Minozzi; Laura Amato; Pier Paolo Pani; Renata Solimini; Simona Vecchi; Franco De Crescenzo; Piergiorgio Zuccaro; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-27

8.  Evaluation of subjective effects of aripiprazole and methamphetamine in methamphetamine-dependent volunteers.

Authors:  Thomas F Newton; Malcolm S Reid; Richard De La Garza; James J Mahoney; Antonio Abad; Rany Condos; Joseph Palamar; Perry N Halkitis; Jurji Mojisak; Ann Anderson; Shou-Hua Li; Ahmed Elkashef
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.176

9.  Evaluation of heterogeneity in pharmacotherapy trials for drug dependence: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  C E Green; F G Moeller; J M Schmitz; J F Lucke; S D Lane; A C Swann; R E Lasky; J P Carbonari
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 10.  Psychological treatments for stimulant misuse, comparing and contrasting those for amphetamine dependence and those for cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Frank J Vocci; Iván D Montoya
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.