Literature DB >> 15729912

Shape-from-shading depends on visual, gravitational, and body-orientation cues.

Heather L Jenkin1, Michael R Jenkin, Richard T Dyde, Laurence R Harris.   

Abstract

The perception of shading-defined form results from an interaction between shading cues and the frames of reference within which those cues are interpreted. In the absence of a clear source of illumination, the definition of 'up' becomes critical to deducing the perceived shape from a particular pattern of shading. In our experiments, twelve subjects adjusted the orientation of a planar disc painted with a linear luminance gradient from one side to the other, until the disc appeared maximally convex-that is, until the luminance gradient induced the maximum perception of a three-dimensional shape. The vision, gravity, and body-orientation cues were altered relative to each other. Visual cues were manipulated by the York Tilted Room facility, and body cues were altered by simply lying on one side. The orientation of the disc that appeared maximally convex varied in a systematic fashion with these manipulations. We present a model in which the direction of perceptual 'up' is determined from the sum of three weighted vectors corresponding to the vision, gravity, and body-orientation cues. The model predicts the perceived direction of 'up', contributes to our understanding of how shape-from-shading is deduced, and also predicts the confidence with which the 'up' direction is perceived.

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15729912     DOI: 10.1068/p5285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  19 in total

1.  The subjective visual vertical and the perceptual upright.

Authors:  Richard T Dyde; Michael R Jenkin; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of altered gravity states on the perception of orientation.

Authors:  Richard T Dyde; Michael R Jenkin; Heather L Jenkin; James E Zacher; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of shape cues on the perception of lighting direction.

Authors:  James P O'Shea; Maneesh Agrawala; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The human visual system's assumption that light comes from above is weak.

Authors:  Yaniv Morgenstern; Richard F Murray; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The motor vertical in the absence of gravicentric cues.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Nils Bury
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.415

6.  Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?

Authors:  A Drakul; C J Bockisch; A A Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The habitual motor vertical of humans depends on gravicentric and egocentric cues, but only little on visual cues.

Authors:  Nils Bury; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The oblique effect is both allocentric and egocentric.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mikellidou; Guido Marco Cicchini; Peter G Thompson; David C Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Factors that determine depth perception of trapezoids, windsurfers, runways.

Authors:  Chia-Huei Tseng; Joetta L Gobell; George Sperling
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Visual gravitational motion and the vestibular system in humans.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco; Iole Indovina; Barbara La Scaleia; Vincenzo Maffei; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.