Literature DB >> 15729147

Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300.

Atsushi Sato1, Asako Yasuda, Hideki Ohira, Kaori Miyawaki, Masami Nishikawa, Hiroaki Kumano, Tomifusa Kuboki.   

Abstract

Feedback negativity is a negative component of the event-related brain potential observed 250-300 ms after feedback stimuli. The present study investigated the effects of value (correct or incorrect) and reward magnitude (no, small or large) on feedback negativity and P300. Feedback negativity was larger after incorrect feedback than after correct feedback, irrespective of reward magnitude. In contrast, P300 amplitude increased with reward magnitude, irrespective of value. The amplitude of feedback negativity was correlated with a trait score of negative affect and not positive affect, whereas P300 amplitude was correlated with positive affect and not negative affect. These results suggest that value and reward magnitude are processed separately in the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15729147     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200503150-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  97 in total

Review 1.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Anxiety and outcome evaluation: the good, the bad and the ambiguous.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Yue Ge; Yang Jiang; Yue-jia Luo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen; Christian E Elger; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Towards a unified model of event-related potentials as phases of stimulus-to-response processing.

Authors:  Brittany K Taylor; William J Gavin; Kevin J Grimm; Mark A Prince; Mei-Heng Lin; Patricia L Davies
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support.

Authors:  Elena Núñez Castellar; Simone Kühn; Wim Fias; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Beyond valence and magnitude: a flexible evaluative coding system in the brain.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Zhihui Lei; Lucas Broster; Tingting Wu; Yang Jiang; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Exposure to money modulates neural responses to outcome evaluations involving social reward.

Authors:  Jin Li; Lei Liu; Yu Sun; Wei Fan; Mei Li; Yiping Zhong
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Sensitivity to monetary reward is most severely compromised in recently abstaining cocaine addicted individuals: a cross-sectional ERP study.

Authors:  Muhammad A Parvaz; Thomas Maloney; Scott J Moeller; Patricia A Woicik; Nelly Alia-Klein; Frank Telang; Gene-Jack Wang; Nancy K Squires; Nora D Volkow; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  The feedback negativity reflects favorable compared to nonfavorable outcomes based on global, not local, alternatives.

Authors:  Autumn Kujawa; Ezra Smith; Christian Luhmann; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.