Literature DB >> 15728767

Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during Translation and Tilt.

Daniel M Merfeld1, Sukyung Park, Claire Gianna-Poulin, F Owen Black, Scott Wood.   

Abstract

To investigate the neural mechanisms that humans use to process the ambiguous force measured by the otolith organs, we measured vestibuloocular reflexes (VORs) and perceptions of tilt and translation. One primary goal was to determine if the same, or different, mechanisms contribute to vestibular perception and action. We used motion paradigms that provided identical sinusoidal inter-aural otolith cues across a broad frequency range. We accomplished this by sinusoidally tilting (20 degrees, 0.005-0.7 Hz) subjects in roll about an earth-horizontal, head-centered, rotation axis ("Tilt") or sinusoidally accelerating (3.3 m/s2, 0.005-0.7 Hz) subjects along their inter-aural axis ("Translation"). While identical inter-aural otolith cues were provided by these motion paradigms, the canal cues were substantially different because roll rotations were present during Tilt but not during Translation. We found that perception was dependent on canal cues because the reported perceptions of both roll tilt and inter-aural translation were substantially different during Translation and Tilt. These findings match internal model predictions that rotational cues from the canals influence the neural processing of otolith cues. We also found horizontal translational VORs at frequencies >0.2 Hz during both Translation and Tilt. These responses were dependent on otolith cues and match simple filtering predictions that translational VORs include contributions via simple high-pass filtering of otolith cues. More generally, these findings demonstrate that internal models govern human vestibular "perception" across a broad range of frequencies and that simple high-pass filters contribute to human horizontal translational VORs ("action") at frequencies above approximately 0.2 Hz.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15728767     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00904.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  79 in total

1.  Frequency dependence of vestibuloocular reflex thresholds.

Authors:  Csilla Haburcakova; Richard F Lewis; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A distributed, dynamic, parallel computational model: the role of noise in velocity storage.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Directional asymmetries and age effects in human self-motion perception.

Authors:  Rachel E Roditi; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-09

4.  Spatial and temporal properties of eye movements produced by electrical stimulation of semicircular canal afferents.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Csilla Haburcakova; Wangsong Gong; Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Role of cerebellum in motion perception and vestibulo-ocular reflex-similarities and disparities.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Antonella Palla; Sarah Marti; Itsaso Olasagasti; Lance M Optican; David S Zee; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Abnormal Tilt Perception During Centrifugation in Patients with Vestibular Migraine.

Authors:  Joanne Wang; Richard F Lewis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-08

8.  Three-dimensional analysis of linear vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans during eccentric rotation while facing downwards.

Authors:  Takao Imai; Yasumitsu Takimoto; Noriaki Takeda; Tomoko Okumura; Hidenori Inohara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The Impact of Oral Promethazine on Human Whole-Body Motion Perceptual Thresholds.

Authors:  Ana Diaz-Artiles; Adrian J Priesol; Torin K Clark; David P Sherwood; Charles M Oman; Laurence R Young; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-24

Review 10.  Computation of egomotion in the macaque cerebellar vermis.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman; Pablo M Blazquez
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.