Literature DB >> 15726967

Development and evaluation of an on-line hide decontamination procedure for use in a commercial beef processing plantt.

Joseph M Bosilevac1, Xiangwu Nou, Matthew S Osborn, Dell M Allen, Mohammad Koohmaraie.   

Abstract

The hides of cattle are the source of Escherichia coli O157:H7 that contaminates beef carcasses during commercial beef processing. Therefore, effective interventions that reduce hide contamination should reduce subsequent carcass contamination. The first objective of this study was to identify the most effective reagents for decontamination of beef hides. Cattle hides draped over barrels were used for in vitro experiments to compare the efficacy of washes using 1.6% sodium hydroxide, 4% trisodium phosphate, 4% chlorofoam, or 4% phosphoric acid, each followed by a rinse step using either water or acidified (pH 7.0) chlorine at 200 or 500 ppm. All treatments using a water rinse reduced hide coliform counts by 1.5 to 2.5 log CFU/ 100 cm2. Compared with water rinses, 200 and 500 ppm acidified chlorine rinses increased efficacy by approximately 1.0 and 2.0 log CFU/100 cm2, respectively. Vacuuming of the treated areas to remove excess liquid improved hide cleanliness by an average of an additional 1.0 log CFU/100 cm2. The second objective was to evaluate the use of an on-line hide-wash cabinet that used a sodium hydroxide wash and a chlorinated (1 ppm) water rinse. Hides sampled before entering and after exiting the cabinet had aerobic plate counts and Enterobacteriaceae counts that were reduced by 2.1 and 3.4 log CFU/100 cm2, respectively, and the prevalence of E. coli O157 on hides was reduced from 44 to 17% when the cabinet was in use. Preevisceration carcass aerobic plate counts and Enterobacteriaceae counts were both reduced by 0.8 log CFU/100 cm2, and the prevalence of E. coli O157 on preevisceration carcasses was reduced from 17 to 2% when the cabinet was in use. These results support decontamination of hides as an effective means to reduce pathogen contamination of cattle carcasses during processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15726967     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-68.2.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  10 in total

1.  Non-O157 verotoxigenic Escherichia coli and beef: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Alexander Gill; Colin O Gill
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Efficacy of octenidine hydrochloride for reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes on cattle hides.

Authors:  Sangeetha Ananda Baskaran; Abhinav Upadhyay; Indu Upadhyaya; Varunkumar Bhattaram; Kumar Venkitanarayanan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Longitudinal study of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a beef cattle feedlot and role of high-level shedders in hide contamination.

Authors:  Terrance M Arthur; James E Keen; Joseph M Bosilevac; Dayna M Brichta-Harhay; Norasak Kalchayanand; Steven D Shackelford; Tommy L Wheeler; Xiangwu Nou; Mohammad Koohmaraie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Are Antimicrobial Interventions Associated with Heat-Resistant Escherichia coli on Meat?

Authors:  Peipei Zhang; Frances Tran; Kim Stanford; Xianqin Yang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  The effect of transportation and lairage on faecal shedding and carcass contamination with Escherichia coli O157 and O26 in very young calves in New Zealand.

Authors:  P Jaros; A L Cookson; A Reynolds; H Withers; R Clemens; G Brightwell; J Mills; J Marshall; D J Prattley; D M Campbell; S Hathaway; N P French
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Saltelli Global Sensitivity Analysis and Simulation Modelling to Identify Intervention Strategies to Reduce the Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 Contaminated Beef Carcasses.

Authors:  Victoria J Brookes; David Jordan; Stephen Davis; Michael P Ward; Jane Heller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157, O26 and O111 in cattle faeces and hides in Italy.

Authors:  S Bonardi; I Alpigiani; R Tozzoli; A Vismarra; V Zecca; C Greppi; C Bacci; I Bruini; F Brindani
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2015-01-20

8.  A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs.

Authors:  Sanga Kang; Joshua Ravensdale; Ranil Coorey; Gary A Dykes; Robert Barlow
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Health, behaviour and growth performance of Charolais and Limousin bulls fattened on different types of flooring.

Authors:  L Magrin; F Gottardo; M Brscic; B Contiero; G Cozzi
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterization of Escherichia coli harboring colibactin genes (clb) isolated from beef production and processing systems.

Authors:  Manita Guragain; John W Schmidt; Norasak Kalchayanand; Aaron M Dickey; Joseph M Bosilevac
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.