Literature DB >> 15725803

Metaplastic breast carcinomas: are they of myoepithelial differentiation?: immunohistochemical profile of the sarcomatoid subtype using novel myoepithelial markers.

Sebastian Leibl1, Margit Gogg-Kammerer, Andrea Sommersacher, Helmut Denk, Farid Moinfar.   

Abstract

We investigated 20 spindle cell (sarcomatoid) metaplastic carcinomas (MCs) without squamous differentiation. In addition, five high-grade phyllodes tumors were assessed for comparison. Our immunohistochemical antibody panel included pan-cytokeratin (CK), low molecular weight CK (CK8/18), four basal cell type CKs (34betaE12, CK5/6, CK14, and CK17), vimentin antibodies, as well as antibodies to established (SMA, CD10, p63, S-100, maspin, calponin, GFAP, SM-myosin), and novel (CD29, 14-3-3sigma) myoepithelial markers. Sixteen of the 20 tumors (80%) expressed at least two markers of the combination CD10/p63/SMA. S-100 detected 1 case negative for CD10/p63/SMA and 3 cases that only expressed one marker of this combination. While 18 MCs (90%) were positive for CD29, 14-3-3sigma (11 cases) and maspin (9 cases) were observed in 55% and 45%, respectively. Antibodies to pan-CK and the basal cell type CKs were strongly reactive in 12 tumors (60%), but in 6 cases (30%) positivity for these markers was weak and only focal; 2 MCs showed no positivity for CK. The stromal component of all phyllodes tumors was positive for vimentin, whereas all other investigated markers were absent except for focal p63 and CD10 expression in 1 case each. Our findings convincingly show a myoepithelial immunophenotype in sarcomatoid MCs, which is demonstrated by the presence of basal cell type CKs and the combination of the established myoepithelial markers CD10, p63, SMA, and S-100. We conclude that tumors with weak or even absent CK expression should only be diagnosed as primary sarcomas of the breast after exclusion of a myoepithelial immunophenotype. CD29 and 14-3-3sigma represent valuable novel myoepithelial markers in these diagnostically difficult cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15725803     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000152133.60278.d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  28 in total

1.  Triple negative mixed metaplastic breast carcinoma with squamous and spindle cells in an 84-year-old woman: a rare entity with unclear management strategy and poor prognosis.

Authors:  Srujitha Murukutla; Vijaya Raj Bhatt; Abhirami Vivekanandarajah; Cynara Coomer; Shilpi Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-02-25

Review 2.  Histological types of breast cancer: how special are they?

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Felipe C Geyer; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Rare co-existence of multifocal myoepitheliosis with infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Alka Bhatia; Ashim Das; Yashwant Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Breast cancer subtypes: morphologic and biologic characterization.

Authors:  Shahla Masood
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-12

5.  [Salivary gland-like tumors of the breast].

Authors:  F Otterbach; K W Schmid
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  A subset of malignant phyllodes tumors express p63 and p40: a diagnostic pitfall in breast core needle biopsies.

Authors:  Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Rajni Sharma; Peter B Illei; Russell Vang; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 7.  A Comparative Review of Mixed Mammary Tumors in Mammals.

Authors:  Eman S A Saad; Jacqueline S Y Lam; Awf A Al-Khan; Mourad Tayebi; Michael J Day; Samantha J Richardson; Janine A Danks
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 8.  Histological and molecular types of breast cancer: is there a unifying taxonomy?

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  The majority of triple-negative breast cancer may correspond to basal-like carcinoma, but triple-negative breast cancer is not identical to basal-like carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoto Kuroda; Masahiko Ohara; Kaori Inoue; Keiko Mizuno; Nokiaki Fujishima; Nobumasa Hamaguchi; Gang-Hong Lee
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Basal-like carcinoma of the breast: further evidence of the possibility that most metaplastic carcinomas may be actually basal-like carcinomas.

Authors:  Naoto Kuroda; Nokiaki Fujishima; Kaori Inoue; Masahiko Ohara; Takashi Hirouchi; Keiko Mizuno; Yoshihiro Hayashi; Gang-Hong Lee
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.