Literature DB >> 15725380

Evolution of transcription factor DNA binding sites.

Ekaterina A Kotelnikova1, Vsevolod J Makeev, Mikhail S Gelfand.   

Abstract

In bioinformatics, binding of transcription regulatory factors to the cognate binding sites is usually described by sequence-specific binding energy, which is estimated from a training sample of sites. This model implies that all binding sites with binding energy above some threshold are functional and site sequence variations should be considered neutral until they do not reduce this energy below the threshold. To quantify this energy, the binding profile (positional weight matrix, PWM) model or consensus-based model is usually applied. Here we show that in many cases available data are not sufficient to construct a relevant PWM, and modified consensus-based model could be more effective to describe binding properties. Further, using the data about binding sites of several transcription factors, we demonstrate that some non-consensus nucleotides in "orthologous sites" (that is, binding sites of the same factor upstream of orthologous genes), which have been believed to be irrelevant or even hindering the regulation, are evolutionary very stable and specific for the regulated gene. For each two considered genomes, the number of substitutions between non-consensus nucleotides is far less than the expected number of neutral substitutions. Moreover, in several positions of binding sites regulating different genes, there are non-consensus nucleotides conserved in distant genomes. It means that there exists a selection pressure, which results in the stability of non-consensus nucleotides.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15725380     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  8 in total

1.  Incorporating evolution of transcription factor binding sites into annotated alignments.

Authors:  Abha S Bais; Stefen Grossmann; Martin Vingron
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Evidence that purifying selection acts on promoter sequences.

Authors:  Robert K Arthur; Ilya Ruvinsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Organization and evolution of the biological response to singlet oxygen stress.

Authors:  Yann S Dufour; Robert Landick; Timothy J Donohue
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Alternative translation start sites are conserved in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Georgii A Bazykin; Alex V Kochetov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Characterization of the SOS meta-regulon in the human gut microbiome.

Authors:  Joseph P Cornish; Neus Sanchez-Alberola; Patrick K O'Neill; Ronald O'Keefe; Jameel Gheba; Ivan Erill
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Impact of DNA-binding position variants on yeast gene expression.

Authors:  Krishna B S Swamy; Chung-Yi Cho; Sufeng Chiang; Zing Tsung-Yeh Tsai; Huai-Kuang Tsai
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A model of evolution with constant selective pressure for regulatory DNA sites.

Authors:  Farida N Enikeeva; Ekaterina A Kotelnikova; Mikhail S Gelfand; Vsevolod J Makeev
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Weak negative and positive selection and the drift load at splice sites.

Authors:  Stepan V Denisov; Georgii A Bazykin; Roman Sutormin; Alexander V Favorov; Andrey A Mironov; Mikhail S Gelfand; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.416

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.