Literature DB >> 17914226

Incorporating evolution of transcription factor binding sites into annotated alignments.

Abha S Bais1, Stefen Grossmann, Martin Vingron.   

Abstract

Identifying transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) is essential to elucidate putative regulatory mechanisms. A common strategy is to combine cross-species conservation with single sequence TFBS annotation to yield "conserved TFBSs". Most current methods in this field adopt a multi-step approach that segregates the two aspects. Again, it is widely accepted that the evolutionary dynamics of binding sites differ from those of the surrounding sequence. Hence, it is desirable to have an approach that explicitly takes this factor into account. Although a plethora of approaches have been proposed for the prediction of conserved TFBSs, very few explicitly model TFBS evolutionary properties, while additionally being multi-step. Recently, we introduced a novel approach to simultaneously align and annotate conserved TFBSs in a pair of sequences. Building upon the standard Smith-Waterman algorithm for local alignments, SimAnn introduces additional states for profiles to output extended alignments or annotated alignments. That is, alignments with parts annotated as gaplessly aligned TFBSs (pair-profile hits)are generated. Moreover,the pair- profile related parameters are derived in a sound statistical framework. In this article, we extend this approach to explicitly incorporate evolution of binding sites in the SimAnn framework. We demonstrate the extension in the theoretical derivations through two position-specific evolutionary models, previously used for modelling TFBS evolution. In a simulated setting, we provide a proof of concept that the approach works given the underlying assumptions,as compared to the original work. Finally, using a real dataset of experimentally verified binding sites in human-mouse sequence pairs,we compare the new approach (eSimAnn) to an existing multi-step tool that also considers TFBS evolution. Although it is widely accepted that binding sites evolve differently from the surrounding sequences, most comparative TFBS identification methods do not explicitly consider this.Additionally, prediction of conserved binding sites is carried out in a multi-step approach that segregates alignment from TFBS annotation. In this paper, we demonstrate how the simultaneous alignment and annotation approach of SimAnn can be further extended to incorporate TFBS evolutionary relationships. We study how alignments and binding site predictions interplay at varying evolutionary distances and for various profile qualities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17914226     DOI: 10.1007/s12038-007-0084-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  29 in total

Review 1.  DNA binding sites: representation and discovery.

Authors:  G D Stormo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Scoring pairwise genomic sequence alignments.

Authors:  F Chiaromonte; V B Yap; W Miller
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2002

3.  Phylogenetic motif detection by expectation-maximization on evolutionary mixtures.

Authors:  A M Moses; D Y Chiang; M B Eisen
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2004

4.  Evolution of transcription factor DNA binding sites.

Authors:  Ekaterina A Kotelnikova; Vsevolod J Makeev; Mikhail S Gelfand
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 5.  Computational methods for transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Eric D Siggia
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Rose: generating sequence families.

Authors:  J Stoye; D Evers; F Meyer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Evolution of transcription factor binding sites in Mammalian gene regulatory regions: conservation and turnover.

Authors:  Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  PhyloGibbs: a Gibbs sampling motif finder that incorporates phylogeny.

Authors:  Rahul Siddharthan; Eric D Siggia; Erik van Nimwegen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Position specific variation in the rate of evolution in transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Alan M Moses; Derek Y Chiang; Manolis Kellis; Eric S Lander; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Functional evolution of a cis-regulatory module.

Authors:  Michael Z Ludwig; Arnar Palsson; Elena Alekseeva; Casey M Bergman; Janaki Nathan; Martin Kreitman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  Use of ChIP-Seq data for the design of a multiple promoter-alignment method.

Authors:  Ionas Erb; Juan R González-Vallinas; Giovanni Bussotti; Enrique Blanco; Eduardo Eyras; Cédric Notredame
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Evolution of gene regulation of pluripotency--the case for wiki tracks at genome browsers.

Authors:  Georg Fuellen; Stephan Struckmann
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 4.540

3.  Tools for simulating evolution of aligned genomic regions with integrated parameter estimation.

Authors:  Avinash Varadarajan; Robert K Bradley; Ian H Holmes
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Genome-wide analysis of promoters: clustering by alignment and analysis of regular patterns.

Authors:  Lucia Pettinato; Elisa Calistri; Francesca Di Patti; Roberto Livi; Stefano Luccioli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Method for the Structure-Based, Genome-Wide Analysis of Bacterial Intergenic Sequences Identifies Shared Compositional and Functional Features.

Authors:  Leonardo Lenzini; Francesca Di Patti; Roberto Livi; Marco Fondi; Renato Fani; Alessio Mengoni
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.