Literature DB >> 15725044

A meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Jean-Philippe Baguet1, Stephane Robitail, Laurent Boyer, David Debensason, Pascal Auquier.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension constitutes a veritable public health issue. Several classes of drugs are available for the treatment of hypertension. The objective of this meta-analytical approach was to assess the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs most commonly used in France in reducing clinical SBP and DBP.
METHODS: The antihypertensive drugs selected were hydrochlorothiazide, indapamide sustained release (SR), furosemide and spironolactone for diuretics; amlodipine and lercanidipine for calcium channel antagonists; atenolol for beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers); enalapril and ramipril for ACE inhibitors; and candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan, and valsartan for angiotensin II receptor antagonists. The trials selected were published between 1973 and 2004, evaluated monotherapy with trial drugs as fixed-dosage or with dosage increase, and assessed blood pressure reduction between 2 and 3 months. The analysis method used was based on the calculation of the sum weighted for the trial size.
RESULTS: A total of 72 trials (comprising 9094 patients) were selected and analyzed. No trial evaluating furosemide or spironolactone satisfied the inclusion criteria for this analysis. For SBP, the reduction was more marked with diuretics, calcium channel antagonists, and ACE inhibitors. Of all the drugs studied, indapamide SR gave the greatest SBP reduction (-22.2 mm Hg). Evaluated therapeutic classes had a similar magnitude of effect on DBP, i.e. reduction between -11.4 mm Hg with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and -10.3 mm Hg with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists.
CONCLUSION: Indapamide SR 1.5 mg appeared to be the most effective drug for a significant reduction in SBP within 2-3 months, which is an essential element in optimizing cardiovascular prevention among hypertensive patients. The clinical application of these results should take into consideration all the limitations discussed in this analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15725044     DOI: 10.2165/00129784-200505020-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs        ISSN: 1175-3277            Impact factor:   3.571


  10 in total

Review 1.  Losartan: a review of its use in stroke risk reduction in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Marit D Moen; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Effects of antihypertensive treatments on incidence of diabetes: a case-control study.

Authors:  M Monami; A Ungar; C Lamanna; G Bardini; L Pala; I Dicembrini; C Marchi; M Vivarelli; S Zannoni; N Bartoli; N Marchionni; C M Rotella; E Mannucci
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Meta-analysis of dose-response relationships for hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide on blood pressure, serum potassium, and urate.

Authors:  Mark A Peterzan; Rebecca Hardy; Nish Chaturvedi; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Efficacy of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide combination for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  Manuel P Morgado; Sandra A Rolo; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2011-02-15

Review 6.  The central mechanism underlying hypertension: a review of the roles of sodium ions, epithelial sodium channels, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, oxidative stress and endogenous digitalis in the brain.

Authors:  Hakuo Takahashi; Masamichi Yoshika; Yutaka Komiyama; Masato Nishimura
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 7.  Treatment efficacy of anti-hypertensive drugs in monotherapy or combination: ATOM systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials according to PRISMA statement.

Authors:  Marco A Paz; Alejandro de-La-Sierra; Marc Sáez; María Antonia Barceló; Juan José Rodríguez; Sonia Castro; Cristina Lagarón; Josep M Garrido; Pilar Vera; Gabriel Coll-de-Tuero
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Practical application of the ATOM study: Treatment efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in monotherapy or combination (ATOM metaanalysis according to PRISMA statement); tables for the use of antihypertensive drugs in monotherapy or combination.

Authors:  Marco A Paz; Monica Farrerons; Marc Saez; Carme Saurina; Marc Garcia Pinto; Sonia Castro; Javier Sobrino; Gabriel Coll de Tuero
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  R M Nixon; E Müller; A Lowy; H Falvey
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Circelli; Gabriele Nicolini; Colin G Egan; Giovanni Cremonesi
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-08-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.