Literature DB >> 15722588

Fan-beam densitometry of the growing skeleton: are we measuring what we think we are?

Jacqueline H Cole1, Tamara A Scerpella, Marjolein C H van der Meulen.   

Abstract

Magnification error in fan-beam densitometers varies with distance from the X-ray source to the bone measured and might obscure bone mineral changes in the growing skeleton. Magnification was examined by scanning aluminum rods of different shapes (square, rectangular, solid round, and hollow round) at four distances above the X-ray source in two orientations, with rods aligned parallel (SI) and perpendicular (ML) to the longitudinal axis of the scanning table. Measured area (cm(2)) decreased linearly with distance above the X-ray source for all rods in the SI orientation (p < 0.005). Measured mineral content (g) decreased linearly with distance but only for SI round rods (p < 0.0001) and for ML hollow round rods (p < 0.005). Area and mineral content decreased 1.6-1.8% per centimeter above the source for round rods. Measured mineral density (g/cm(2)) decreased linearly with distance from the source only for ML hollow round rods (p < 0.005). Variation in area, mineral content, and mineral density measurements was 6.6-6.9%, 6.9-7.5%, and 1.9-2.3%, respectively, for SI round rods. Magnification errors of this magnitude are problematic for clinical studies using fan-beam densitometry. Particularly in pediatric subjects, increases in soft tissue during normal growth could increase a bone's distance from the fan-beam source and result in apparent reductions in area and bone mineral content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15722588     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:8:1:057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  8 in total

1.  Mechanical loading during growth is associated with plane-specific differences in vertebral geometry: A cross-sectional analysis comparing artistic gymnasts vs. non-gymnasts.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Paula F Rosenbaum; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Skeletal benefits of pre-menarcheal gymnastics are retained after activity cessation.

Authors:  Tamara A Scerpella; Jodi N Dowthwaite; Nicole M Gero; Jill A Kanaley; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder
Journal:  Pediatr Exerc Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.333

3.  Bone geometry, density, and strength indices of the distal radius reflect loading via childhood gymnastic activity.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Portia P E Flowers; Joseph A Spadaro; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  The impact of LRP5 polymorphism (rs556442) on calcium homeostasis, bone mineral density, and body composition in Iranian children.

Authors:  Elham Ashouri; Elham Mahmoodi Meimandi; Forough Saki; Mohammad Hossein Dabbaghmanesh; Gholamhossein Ranjbar Omrani; Marzieh Bakhshayeshkaram
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Skeletal geometry and indices of bone strength in artistic gymnasts.

Authors:  J N Dowthwaite; T A Scerpella
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Correcting fan-beam magnification in clinical densitometry scans of growing subjects.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Jodi N Dowthwaite; Tamara A Scerpella; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Association analyses of vitamin D-binding protein gene with compression strength index variation in Caucasian nuclear families.

Authors:  X-H Xu; D-H Xiong; X-G Liu; Y Guo; Y Chen; J Zhao; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Does a spinal implant alter dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements?

Authors:  Pei-Lin Hsiao; Shu-Feng Hsu; Po-Han Chen; Hsiao-Wei Tsai; Hsin-Ying Lu; Yue-Sheng Wang; Li-Wen Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.