Literature DB >> 15722268

Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.

Volker Musahl1, Anton Plakseychuk, Andrew VanScyoc, Tomoyuki Sasaki, Richard E Debski, Patrick J McMahon, Freddie H Fu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee kinematics and in situ forces resulting from anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with 2 femoral tunnel positions were evaluated. HYPOTHESIS: A graft placed inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament will restore knee function better than a graft placed at a position for best graft isometry. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Ten cadaveric knees were tested in response to a 134-N anterior load and a combined 10-N.m valgus and 5-N.m internal rotation load. A robotic universal force-moment sensor testing system was used to apply loads, and resulting kinematics were recorded. An active surgical robot system was used for positioning tunnels in 2 locations in the femoral notch: inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament and a position for best graft isometry. The same quadrupled hamstring tendon graft was used for both tunnel positions. The 2 loading conditions were applied.
RESULTS: At 30 degrees of knee flexion, anterior tibial translation in response to the anterior load for the intact knee was 9.8 +/- 3.1 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 13.8 +/- 4.6 mm; position 2: 16.6 +/- 3.7 mm; P < .05). There was a significant difference between the 2 tunnel positions. At the same flexion angle, the anterior tibial translation in response to the combined load for the intact knee was 7.7 +/- 4.0 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 10.4 +/- 5.5 mm; position 2: 12.0 +/- 5.2 mm; P < .05), with a significant difference between the tunnel positions.
CONCLUSION: Neither femoral tunnel position restores normal kinematics of the intact knee. A femoral tunnel position inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament results in knee kinematics closer to the intact knee than does a tunnel position located for best graft isometry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Anatomical femoral tunnel position is important in reproducing function of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15722268     DOI: 10.1177/0363546504271747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  92 in total

1.  [Arthroscopic filling of malplaced and enlarged drill tunnels with iliac crest spongiosa in recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  T Zantop; W Petersen
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Measuring the anterior cruciate ligament's footprints by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yung Han; David Kurzencwyg; Adam Hart; Tom Powell; Paul A Martineau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The effects of limb alignment on anterior cruciate ligament graft tunnel positions estimated from plain radiographs.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Andrew K Wong; J J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of tunnel positions in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using computer navigation.

Authors:  James E Voos; Volker Musahl; Travis G Maak; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Knee stability, athletic performance and sport-specific tasks in non-professional soccer players after ACL reconstruction: comparing trans-tibial and antero-medial portal techniques.

Authors:  Cosimo Tudisco; Salvatore Bisicchia; Andrea Cosentino; Federica Chiozzi; Massimo Piva
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-10-20

6.  Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  J P van der List; H A Zuiderbaan; D H Nawabi; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Clinically relevant anatomy and what anatomic reconstruction means.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Samuel G Moulton; Marco Nitri; Werner Mueller; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Morphometric side-to-side differences in human cruciate ligament insertions.

Authors:  Jens Dargel; Peer Pohl; Prokopios Tzikaras; Juergen Koebke
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 9.  Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review.

Authors:  Charles Crawford; John Nyland; Sarah Landes; Richard Jackson; Haw Chong Chang; Akbar Nawab; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Long-term results after reconstruction of the ACL with hamstrings autograft and transtibial femoral drilling.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Torbjørn Strand; Cornelia Fischer-Bredenbeck; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.