Literature DB >> 15720269

The agony and ecstasy of "OMIC" technologies in drug development.

John A Bilello1.   

Abstract

Over the last decade we have witnessed a fundamental change in how biomedical research is carried out and we can now assess the impact of the Human Genome Project on drug discovery and development. Advances in "omics" technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabonomics) were touted as having the potential to revolutionize our approach to disease diagnosis, prognostication and development of novel therapeutics. However, the promise of rapid advances in medicine "from the lab bench to the bedside" has not manifested as of yet. Indeed it appears that the translational applications of genomic-based research have preceded the development of both (i) a conceptual framework for disease understanding and (ii) effective tools that can exploit the vast amounts of data derived from these efforts. In reality great progress has been made, however understanding processes such as disease progression (or drug response) requires systematic insight into dynamic (and temporal) differences in gene regulation, interaction and function. This review will discuss "omic" technologies with the emphasis upon advances in our understanding of the human genome derived transcriptome (RNA), and its proteome (proteins), while focusing upon the translation of this information into the drug development paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15720269     DOI: 10.2174/1566524053152898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Mol Med        ISSN: 1566-5240            Impact factor:   2.222


  13 in total

Review 1.  Systems Pharmacology Links GPCRs with Retinal Degenerative Disorders.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 13.820

2.  Translational medicine: can it really facilitate the transition of research "from bench to bedside"?

Authors:  Martin Wehling
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Toxicogenomics in regulatory ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; George P Daston; Sigmund J Degitz; Nancy D Denslow; Robert A Hoke; Sean W Kennedy; Ann L Miracle; Edward J Perkins; Jason Snape; Donald E Tillitt; Charles R Tyler; Donald Versteeg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Application of micro- and nano-electromechanical devices to drug delivery.

Authors:  Mark Staples; Karen Daniel; Michael J Cima; Robert Langer
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  A proteomic primer for the clinician.

Authors:  Yurong Guo; Zongming Fu; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2007-01

Review 6.  Lower urinary tract disease: what are we trying to treat and in whom?

Authors:  Jeremy P W Heaton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  The therapeutic monoclonal antibody market.

Authors:  Dawn M Ecker; Susan Dana Jones; Howard L Levine
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

8.  Safety assessment of cosmetics by read across applied to metabolomics data of in vitro skin and liver models.

Authors:  Carine Jacques; Emilien L Jamin; Isabelle Jouanin; Cécile Canlet; Marie Tremblay-Franco; Jean-François Martin; Daniel Zalko; Yves Brunel; Sandrine Bessou-Touya; Laurent Debrauwer; Pierre-Jacques Ferret; Hélène Duplan
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 9.  The plasma proteome, adductome and idiosyncratic toxicity in toxicoproteomics research.

Authors:  B Alex Merrick
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2008-02-12

Review 10.  The role of toxicoproteomics in assessing organ specific toxicity.

Authors:  B Alex Merrick; Frank A Witzmann
Journal:  EXS       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.