Literature DB >> 15719969

Visibility of simulated microcalcifications--a hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems.

Chao-Jen Lai1, Chris C Shaw, Gary J Whitman, Dennis A Johnston, Wei T Yang, Veronica Selinko, Elsa Arribas, Basak Dogan, S Cheenu Kappadath.   

Abstract

Full-field digital mammography systems are currently available for clinical use. These digital systems offer improved image quality, flexible image processing, display, storage, retrieval, and transmission. These systems employ a variety of different x-ray detectors based on storage phosphors (in computed radiography), charge-coupled devices (CCDs), or amorphous silicon flat panels (FPs). The objective of this study is to compare three different types of mammographic detectors: screenfilm (SF) combination, a CsI-based FP detector, a CCD and x-ray phosphor-based detector for their performance in detection of simulated microcalcifications. Microcalcifications (MCs) were simulated with calcium carbonate grains of various sizes (90-355 microm). They were overlapped with a slab of simulated 50% adipose/50% glandular breast tissue for a uniform background or an anthropomorphic breast phantom for a tissue structure background. Images of the phantoms, acquired with and without magnification, were reviewed by mammographers, physicists, and students. A five-point confidence level rating was given for each MC reviewed. Average ratings from the mammographers were used to compare the performances of the three imaging systems, various MC size groups, and two magnification modes. The results indicate that with uniform background and no magnification, the FP system performed the best while the SF system did slightly better than the CCD system. With magnification added, all detection tasks were improved except for the smallest and largest one or two size groups. In particular, detection in the SF and CCD images was significantly improved over that in the FP images. With tissue structure background and no magnification, the FP system was outperformed by the SF and the CCD systems. With magnification added, the performance of the FP and the CCD systems was improved significantly. With this improvement, the SF and FP systems were outperformed by the CCD system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15719969     DOI: 10.1118/1.1833011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic quality of 50 and 100 μm computed radiography compared with screen-film mammography in operative breast specimens.

Authors:  C M Pagliari; T Hoang; M Reddy; L S Wilkinson; J D Poloniecki; R M Given-Wilson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of two detector systems for cone beam CT small animal imaging - a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yang Meng; Chris C Shaw; Xinming Liu; Mustafa C Altunbas; Tianpeng Wang; Lingyun Chen; Shu-Ju Tu; S Cheenu Kappadath; Chao-Jen Lai
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2006-03-02

3.  Detection of microcalcifications by characteristic magnetic susceptibility effects using MR phase image cross-correlation analysis.

Authors:  Richard A Baheza; E Brian Welch; Daniel F Gochberg; Melinda Sanders; Sara Harvey; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the detection of simulated microcalcifications on mammograms using hardcopy images.

Authors:  Chao-Jen Lai; Chris C Shaw; Gary J Whitman; Wei T Yang; Peter J Dempsey; Victoria Nguyen; Mary F Ice
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: noise reduction techniques.

Authors:  S Cheenu Kappadath; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.609

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.