Literature DB >> 15717549

Foveal contour interaction: detection and discrimination.

Oliver Ehrt1, Robert F Hess.   

Abstract

Contour interaction, the detrimental effect of flanking features on the discrimination of optotypes, has been studied mainly close to the visual acuity limit. We were interested to know how these results compare with those for the detection of targets. According to the simplest model of contour interaction, comparable detection effects would be expected. The case for low-level masking would be further strengthened if the form and nature of the dependence on flank separation and flank polarity followed that typically found in studies of lateral spatial masking [Vision Res. 33, 993 (1993)]. Landolt Cs subtending a visual angle of 0.25 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 1.0 degrees were presented and contrast thresholds for detecting the presence of the Landolt C and discriminating its orientation were measured in five normal subjects as a function of flank separation and flank polarity. The results obtained for the relationship between detection and discrimination depend on the size of the target used. For small letters, discrimination but not detection was significantly affected by flanking bars. For large letters, detection and discrimination were affected to the same extent. However, in this case the effectiveness of opposite-polarity flanks and the finding that facilitation occurred at close, not far, flank separations suggests that the simplest explanation in terms of masking may not be applicable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15717549     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.22.000209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  5 in total

1.  Contour interaction under photopic and scotopic conditions.

Authors:  Lenka Musilová; František Pluhácek; Stephanie M Marten-Ellis; Harold E Bedell; John Siderov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Contour interaction in foveal vision: a response to Siderov, Waugh, and Bedell (2013).

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system.

Authors:  Marina V Danilova; Valeria M Bondarko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Crowding can impact both low and high contrast visual acuity measurements.

Authors:  František Pluháček; John Siderov; Ivana Macháčová
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Seven Myths on Crowding and Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  Hans Strasburger
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-05-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.