Literature DB >> 15716368

Testing Bayesian models of human coincidence timing.

Makoto Miyazaki1, Daichi Nozaki, Yasoichi Nakajima.   

Abstract

A sensorimotor control task often requires an accurate estimation of the timing of the arrival of an external target (e.g., when hitting a pitched ball). Conventional studies of human timing processes have ignored the stochastic features of target timing: e.g., the speed of the pitched ball is not generally constant, but is variable. Interestingly, based on Bayesian theory, it has been recently shown that the human sensorimotor system achieves the optimal estimation by integrating sensory information with prior knowledge of the probabilistic structure of the target variation. In this study, we tested whether Bayesian integration is also implemented while performing a coincidence-timing type of sensorimotor task by manipulating the trial-by-trial variability (i.e., the prior distribution) of the target timing. As a result, within several hundred trials of learning, subjects were able to generate systematic timing behavior according to the width of the prior distribution, as predicted by the optimal Bayesian model. Considering the previous studies showing that the human sensorimotor system uses Bayesian integration in spacing and force-grading tasks, our result indicates that Bayesian integration is fundamental to all aspects of human sensorimotor control. Moreover, it was noteworthy that the subjects could adjust their behavior both when the prior distribution was switched from wide to narrow and vice versa, although the adjustment was slower in the former case. Based on a comparison with observations in a previous study, we discuss the flexibility and adaptability of Bayesian sensorimotor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15716368     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01168.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  47 in total

Review 1.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task.

Authors:  Hadley Tassinari; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Supramodal representation of temporal priors calibrates interval timing.

Authors:  Huihui Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Extrapolation of vertical target motion through a brief visual occlusion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Marco Iosa; Vincenzo Maffei; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  How much to trust the senses: likelihood learning.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Sato; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Stochastic modelling of muscle recruitment during activity.

Authors:  Saulo Martelli; Daniela Calvetti; Erkki Somersalo; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Sensorimotor priors are effector dependent.

Authors:  Cong Yin; Huijun Wang; Kunlin Wei; Konrad P Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Differential representations of prior and likelihood uncertainty in the human brain.

Authors:  Iris Vilares; James D Howard; Hugo L Fernandes; Jay A Gottfried; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Temporal context calibrates interval timing.

Authors:  Mehrdad Jazayeri; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Learning priors for Bayesian computations in the nervous system.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Martin Voss; Konrad Kording
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.