PURPOSE: To evaluate various strategies designed to improve the specificity of the interpretation of results obtained with the frequency doubling technology perimeter (FDT) used in the full-threshold mode. METHODS: Three different strategies were compared using data from 452 glaucoma patients and 237 healthy subjects: combining several FDT parameters from a single test, combining the FDT test with a GDx test, and confirming an abnormal FDT test result with a repeat test. RESULTS: Confirming an abnormal FDT test result with a repeat test yielded a specificity increase of 0.10, from 0.80 to 0.90, at the expense of some loss of sensitivity for early but not for moderate or severe glaucoma. Combining several FDT parameters from a single test and combining FDT with GDx did not yield any noticeable increase in diagnostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: A modest increase in FDT diagnostic performance can be obtained by the confirmation of an abnormal test result with a repeat test.
PURPOSE: To evaluate various strategies designed to improve the specificity of the interpretation of results obtained with the frequency doubling technology perimeter (FDT) used in the full-threshold mode. METHODS: Three different strategies were compared using data from 452 glaucomapatients and 237 healthy subjects: combining several FDT parameters from a single test, combining the FDT test with a GDx test, and confirming an abnormal FDT test result with a repeat test. RESULTS: Confirming an abnormal FDT test result with a repeat test yielded a specificity increase of 0.10, from 0.80 to 0.90, at the expense of some loss of sensitivity for early but not for moderate or severe glaucoma. Combining several FDT parameters from a single test and combining FDT with GDx did not yield any noticeable increase in diagnostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: A modest increase in FDT diagnostic performance can be obtained by the confirmation of an abnormal test result with a repeat test.
Authors: Jean-Claude Mwanza; Joshua L Warren; Jessica T Hochberg; Donald L Budenz; Robert T Chang; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2015 Oct-Nov Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Mário L R Monteiro; André L F Portes; Frederico C Moura; Dina B W Regensteiner Journal: Jpn J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 2.447