Literature DB >> 15715066

Development of a test environment to evaluate performance of modern hearing aid features.

Michael Nilsson1, Robert M Ghent, Victor Bray, Richard Harris.   

Abstract

This article describes a new test environment and materials with the potential to measure performance differences among different hearing aid signal processing methods and features. Normative data suggest a linearly predictable increase in difficulty on a speech-in-noise task as the masker changes from random noise to multiple-talker speech, and the number of talkers increases. Data collected with normal listeners revealed no differences across four test sites for the single loudspeaker (Noise-Front) results and some differences across test sites for the multiple loudspeaker results. Room dimension differences among audiometric test enclosures and diffusion (or lack thereof) of the maskers in the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the sound fields appear to account for performance differences for the multiloudspeaker arrays, confirming the need to limit maskers to aperiodic signals in rooms with controlled ceiling height or to establish norms for each test environment such that results obtained in different enclosures can be compared.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15715066     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.1.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  5 in total

1.  Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Melinda C Anderson; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Lewis O Harvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Exploring the limits of frequency lowering.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kathryn H Arehart; James M Kates; Naomi B H Croghan; Namita Gehani
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.

Authors:  Suzanne Carr Levy; Daniel J Freed; Michael Nilsson; Brian C J Moore; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.