Literature DB >> 15711264

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients.

Jens Rassweiler1, Michael Schulze, Dogu Teber, Reinaldo Marrero, Othmar Seemann, Joachim Rumpelt, Thomas Frede.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has become an accepted alternative to open surgery. However, there is still a lack of data concerning the oncological outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 1999 to July 2004, 1,078 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our institution. Oncological results in the first 500 patients with a minimal followup of 23 months were analyzed, focusing on positive margins, prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure, clinical progression and survival.
RESULTS: Median followup was 40 months (range 23 to 65). Of the patients 417 underwent pelvic lymph node dissection, which revealed positive nodes in 6 (1.2%). Positive margins were documented in 22 of 296 pT2 tumors (7.4%), 27 of 107 pT3a tumors (25.2%) and 29 of 69 pT3b tumors (42.0%). PSA recurrence was diagnosed in 55 patients (11.0%) at a mean of 20.8 months (range 6 to 36) that is stages pT2a, pT2b, pT3a and pT3b/4 in 3.2%, 6.5%, 15.9% and 23.9%, respectively. PSA progression-free rates were 83.0% at 3 years and 73.1% at 5 years. Two patients died of disease and 6 died of other causes (99.2% overall survival). The clinical progression rate was to 4.1% at 3 years and 9.8% at 5 years. No port site metastasis was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: At centers of expertise laparoscopic radical prostatectomy may provide an oncological outcome similar to that of the open procedure. However, it offers the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15711264     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000153486.94741.e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  29 in total

1.  Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients.

Authors:  L Goeman; L Salomon; A La De Taille; D Vordos; A Hoznek; R Yiou; C C Abbou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  [Laparoscopic pelvic surgery: Where do we stand in the year 2006?].

Authors:  J Rassweiler; D Teber; J de la Rosette; P Laguna; V Pansodoro; T Frede
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  [Laparascopic radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R Ganzer; M Do; B P Rai; A Dietel; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Continuous suture of a single absorbable suture: a new simplified vesicourethral anastomosis technique in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Peng-fei Shao; Qiang Lv; Ning-hong Song; Jie Li; Wei Zhang; Pu Li; Li-xin Hua; Chang-jun Yin
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

8.  Mid-term biochemical recurrence-free outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Charles-Henry Rochat; Jean Sauvain; Pierre Dubernard; April E Hebert; Usha Kreaden
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-04-09

9.  Cell-based selection provides novel molecular probes for cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Kwame Sefah; Kyung-Mi Bae; Joseph A Phillips; Dietmar W Siemann; Zhen Su; Steve McClellan; Johannes Vieweg; Weihong Tan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; James A Eastham; Fernando P Secin; Javier Romero Otero; Angel Serio; Jason Stasi; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Andrew Vickers; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.