Literature DB >> 15711084

Prenatal testing guidelines: time for a new approach.

Miriam Kuppermann1, Mary E Norton.   

Abstract

Numerous advances over the past 15 years have led to a much wider array of prenatal testing options for pregnant women who are interested in obtaining information regarding the chromosomal status of their fetus. However, despite recent data calling into question the assumptions underlying current testing guidelines, including those inherent in the risk-based threshold for offering invasive testing, chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis are still typically offered only to women whose likelihood of carrying a fetus affected by a chromosomal disorder such as Down syndrome is at least as high as that of the average 35-year-old. In this paper, we summarize the evidence suggesting that this aspect of prenatal testing guidelines should be revisited, and that women should be allowed to make informed decisions regarding the use of invasive testing that are reflective of their own values and preferences. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15711084     DOI: 10.1159/000083479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  6 in total

1.  MALDI-TOF MS in Prenatal Genomics.

Authors:  Xiao Yan Zhong; Wolfgang Holzgreve
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Birthing ethics: what mothers, families, childbirth educators, nurses, and physicians should know about the ethics of childbirth.

Authors:  Jennifer M Torres; Raymond G De Vries
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Suzanna G M Frints; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Genome-wide linkage analysis is a powerful prenatal diagnostic tool in families with unknown genetic defects.

Authors:  Maria Arélin; Bernt Schulze; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Denise Horn; Alexander Diers; Birgit Uhlenberg; Peter Nürnberg; Gudrun Nürnberg; Christian Becker; Stefan Mundlos; Tom H Lindner; Karl Sperling; Katrin Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Maternal age-based prenatal screening for chromosomal disorders: attitudes of women and health care providers toward changes.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Andrea Rideout; Brenda J Wilson; Judith Allanson; Sean Blaine; Mary Jane Esplen; Sandra Farrell; Gail E Graham; Jennifer MacKenzie; Wendy S Meschino; Preeti Prakash; Cheryl Shuman; Sherry Taylor; Stasey Tobin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  The scope of prenatal diagnosis for women at increased risk for aneuploidies: views and preferences of professionals and potential users.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Anja Krumeich; Julie Boonekamp; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-11-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.