Literature DB >> 15710946

Safety and efficacy of two different doses of capecitabine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in older women.

Emilio Bajetta1, Giuseppe Procopio, Luigi Celio, Luca Gattinoni, Silvia Della Torre, Luigi Mariani, Laura Catena, Riccardo Ricotta, Raffaella Longarini, Nicoletta Zilembo, Roberto Buzzoni.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine in older women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three eligible patients (median age, 73 years; range, 65 to 89 years) were enrolled. The first 30 patients received oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 21 days. Due to the occurrence of two toxic deaths, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily was given to the subsequent 43 patients.
RESULTS: All patients were assessable for safety and efficacy. A total of 351 treatment cycles were administered (median, six per patient; range, one to eight cycles). Dose reductions due to toxicities were required in 30% of patients in the standard-dose group, but capecitabine was given without a dose reduction to 95% of patients in the low-dose group. Capecitabine demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The overall incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was low: the most common events reported in </= 10% of the patients were fatigue, diarrhea, dyspnea, and nausea. In the standard-dose group, the response rate was 36.7% (95% CI, 19.9% to 56.1%). An additional seven patients had disease stabilization at >/= 24 weeks. In the low-dose group, the response rate was 34.9% (95% CI, 21% to 50.9%). An additional 15 patients had prolonged stabilization. The median time to disease progression was 4 months in either group.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that capecitabine is safe and effective in the elderly breast cancer patient. Based on the overall results, the capecitabine dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily merits consideration as "standard" for older patients who do not have severely impaired renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15710946     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  35 in total

1.  Efficacy of different dosing schedules of capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Anupama Suresh; Akannsha Ganju; Evan Morgan; Marilly Palettas; Julie A Stephens; Joseph Liu; Michael Berger; Craig Vargo; Anne Noonan; Raquel Reinbolt; Mathew Cherian; Jeffrey VanDeusen; Sagar Sardesai; Robert Wesolowski; Daniel G Stover; Maryam Lustberg; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Nicole Williams
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  A comparison of toxicity profiles between the lower and standard dose capecitabine in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomohiro F Nishijima; Maya Suzuki; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  The outcomes and safety of single-agent sorafenib in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Authors:  Hilda Wong; Yuen Fong Tang; Tzy-Jyun Yao; Joanne Chiu; Roland Leung; Pierre Chan; Tan To Cheung; Albert C Chan; Roberta W Pang; Ronnie Poon; Sheung-Tat Fan; Thomas Yau
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-12-01

4.  Bleomycin electrochemotherapy in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients: clinical outcome and management considerations.

Authors:  Luca G Campana; Sara Galuppo; Sara Valpione; Antonella Brunello; Cristina Ghiotto; Alessia Ongaro; Carlo R Rossi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Role of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab in the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Maria Di Bartolomeo; Filippo Pietrantonio; Antonia Martinetti; Roberto Buzzoni; Arpine Gevorgyan; Emilio Bajetta
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination as first- or second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a Wisconsin Oncology Network trial.

Authors:  U O Njiaju; A J Tevaarwerk; K Kim; J E Chang; R M Hansen; T L Champeny; A M Traynor; S Meadows; L Van Ummersen; K Powers; J A Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Fixed-dose capecitabine is feasible: results from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic study in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Michelle A Rudek; Roisin M Connolly; Janelle M Hoskins; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Stacie C Jeter; Deborah K Armstrong; John H Fetting; Vered Stearns; Laurie A Wright; Ming Zhao; Stanley P Watkins; Howard L McLeod; Nancy E Davidson; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Oncologic outcome after cessation or dose reduction of capecitabine in patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  Jung-A Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Hyun-Sook Son; Hyoung Ran Kim; Hae Ran Yun; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Woo Yong Lee; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2010-08-31

9.  Chemotherapy in Patients with Anthracycline- and Taxane-Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Overview.

Authors:  Eleni Andreopoulou; Joseph A Sparano
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2013-03-01

10.  Oral Capecitabine-Vinorelbine is Associated with Longer Overall Survival When Compared to Single-Agent Capecitabine in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Claudio Vernieri; Michele Prisciandaro; Federico Nichetti; Riccardo Lobefaro; Giorgia Peverelli; Francesca Ligorio; Emma Zattarin; Maria Silvia Cona; Pierangela Sepe; Francesca Corti; Sara Manglaviti; Marta Brambilla; Barbara Re; Antonino Belfiore; Giancarlo Pruneri; Luigi Celio; Gabriella Mariani; Giulia Valeria Bianchi; Licia Rivoltini; Giuseppe Capri; Filippo de Braud
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.