PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine in older women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three eligible patients (median age, 73 years; range, 65 to 89 years) were enrolled. The first 30 patients received oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 21 days. Due to the occurrence of two toxic deaths, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily was given to the subsequent 43 patients. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for safety and efficacy. A total of 351 treatment cycles were administered (median, six per patient; range, one to eight cycles). Dose reductions due to toxicities were required in 30% of patients in the standard-dose group, but capecitabine was given without a dose reduction to 95% of patients in the low-dose group. Capecitabine demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The overall incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was low: the most common events reported in </= 10% of the patients were fatigue, diarrhea, dyspnea, and nausea. In the standard-dose group, the response rate was 36.7% (95% CI, 19.9% to 56.1%). An additional seven patients had disease stabilization at >/= 24 weeks. In the low-dose group, the response rate was 34.9% (95% CI, 21% to 50.9%). An additional 15 patients had prolonged stabilization. The median time to disease progression was 4 months in either group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that capecitabine is safe and effective in the elderly breast cancer patient. Based on the overall results, the capecitabine dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily merits consideration as "standard" for older patients who do not have severely impaired renal function.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine in older women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three eligible patients (median age, 73 years; range, 65 to 89 years) were enrolled. The first 30 patients received oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 21 days. Due to the occurrence of two toxic deaths, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily was given to the subsequent 43 patients. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for safety and efficacy. A total of 351 treatment cycles were administered (median, six per patient; range, one to eight cycles). Dose reductions due to toxicities were required in 30% of patients in the standard-dose group, but capecitabine was given without a dose reduction to 95% of patients in the low-dose group. Capecitabine demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The overall incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was low: the most common events reported in </= 10% of the patients were fatigue, diarrhea, dyspnea, and nausea. In the standard-dose group, the response rate was 36.7% (95% CI, 19.9% to 56.1%). An additional seven patients had disease stabilization at >/= 24 weeks. In the low-dose group, the response rate was 34.9% (95% CI, 21% to 50.9%). An additional 15 patients had prolonged stabilization. The median time to disease progression was 4 months in either group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that capecitabine is safe and effective in the elderly breast cancerpatient. Based on the overall results, the capecitabine dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily merits consideration as "standard" for older patients who do not have severely impaired renal function.
Authors: Hilda Wong; Yuen Fong Tang; Tzy-Jyun Yao; Joanne Chiu; Roland Leung; Pierre Chan; Tan To Cheung; Albert C Chan; Roberta W Pang; Ronnie Poon; Sheung-Tat Fan; Thomas Yau Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011-12-01
Authors: Luca G Campana; Sara Galuppo; Sara Valpione; Antonella Brunello; Cristina Ghiotto; Alessia Ongaro; Carlo R Rossi Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-05-03 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: U O Njiaju; A J Tevaarwerk; K Kim; J E Chang; R M Hansen; T L Champeny; A M Traynor; S Meadows; L Van Ummersen; K Powers; J A Stewart Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Michelle A Rudek; Roisin M Connolly; Janelle M Hoskins; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Stacie C Jeter; Deborah K Armstrong; John H Fetting; Vered Stearns; Laurie A Wright; Ming Zhao; Stanley P Watkins; Howard L McLeod; Nancy E Davidson; Antonio C Wolff Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 4.872