Literature DB >> 15710137

The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.

S A Sohaib1, T D Mills, A Sahdev, J A W Webb, P O Vantrappen, I J Jacobs, R H Reznek.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing adnexal masses, and to determine which patients may benefit from MRI.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 72 women (mean age 53 years, range 19 to 86 years) with clinically suspected adnexal masses. A single experienced sonographer performed transabdominal and transvaginal greyscale spectral and colour Doppler examinations. MRI was carried out on a 1.5T system using T1, T2 and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences before and after intravenous injection of gadolinium. The adnexal masses were categorized as benign or malignant without knowledge of clinical details, according to the imaging features which were compared with the surgical and pathological findings.
RESULTS: For characterizing lesions as malignant, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI were 96.6%, 83.7% and 88.9%, respectively, and of US were 100%, 39.5% and 63.9%, respectively. MRI was more specific (p<0.05) than US. Both MRI and US correctly diagnosed 17 (24%) cases with benign and 28 (39%) cases with malignant masses. MRI correctly diagnosed 19 (26%) cases with benign lesion(s), which on US were thought to be malignant. The age, menopausal status and CA-125 levels in these women made benign disease likely, but US features were suggestive of malignancy (large masses and solid-cystic lesions with nodules).
CONCLUSION: MRI is more specific and accurate than US and Doppler assessment for characterizing adnexal masses. Women who clinically have a relatively low risk of malignancy but who have complex sonographic features may benefit from MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15710137     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  28 in total

1.  Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions.

Authors:  Bianka Chilla; Nik Hauser; Gad Singer; Mafalda Trippel; Johannes M Froehlich; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Comparative evaluation of multidetector CT and MR imaging in the differentiation of adnexal masses.

Authors:  A C Tsili; C Tsampoulas; M Argyropoulou; I Navrozoglou; Y Alamanos; E Paraskevaidis; S C Efremidis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses.

Authors:  Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Emile Daraï; Charles A Cuenod; Laure Fournier; Irwin Toussaint; Claude Marsault; Marc Bazot
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management.

Authors:  Sinead H McEvoy; Stephanie Nougaret; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Christine O Menias; Fuki Shitano; Shinya Fujii; Ramon E Sosa; Joanna G Escalon; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-10

Review 6.  An update on the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Benjapa Khiewvan; Drew A Torigian; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Koosha Paydary; Ali Salavati; Sina Houshmand; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol for the assessment of adnexal masses.

Authors:  Patrick N Pereira; Luis O Sarian; Adriana Yoshida; Karla G Araújo; Ricardo H O Barros; Ana C Baião; Daniella B Parente; Sophie Derchain
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  J E Dodge; A L Covens; C Lacchetti; L M Elit; T Le; M Devries-Aboud; M Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Simulated impact of pelvic MRI in treatment planning for pediatric adnexal masses.

Authors:  Alessandro Marro; Lisa M Allen; Sari L Kives; Rahim Moineddin; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-20

Review 10.  MR imaging in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S A A Sohaib; R H Reznek
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.