Literature DB >> 15709859

Stroop dilution revisited: evidence for domain-specific, limited-capacity processing.

Martha Anne Roberts1, Derek Besner.   

Abstract

Nine experiments show that in the context of Stroop dilution the extent to which flanking distractors are processed depends on the nature of the material at fixation. A Stroop effect is eliminated if a word or a nonword is colored and appears at fixation and the color word appears as a flanker. A Stroop effect is observed when the color carrier at fixation is from a different domain than the color word distractor (e.g., Arabic digits). It is argued that when the material at fixation is in the same domain as the color word distractor, the distractor is not processed. Taken together, these results implicate a role for material-specific, limited-capacity processing in the context of this variant of the Stroop paradigm.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15709859     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

1.  Non-intentional but not automatic: reduction of word- and arrow-based compatibility effects by sound distractors in the same categorical domain.

Authors:  James D Miles; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jong Moon Choi; Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

3.  Dietary nitrate improves sprint performance and cognitive function during prolonged intermittent exercise.

Authors:  Christopher Thompson; Lee J Wylie; Jonathan Fulford; James Kelly; Matthew I Black; Sinead T J McDonagh; Asker E Jeukendrup; Anni Vanhatalo; Andrew M Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Bo Youn Park; Sujin Kim; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.

Authors:  Ludovic Ferrand; Maria Augustinova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

6.  Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.

Authors:  Carmel Mevorach; Yehoshua Tsal; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-10

7.  In pursuit of off-task thought: mind wandering-performance trade-offs while reading aloud and color naming.

Authors:  David R Thomson; Derek Besner; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-18

8.  The temporal dynamics of visual working memory guidance of selective attention.

Authors:  Jinfeng Tan; Yuanfang Zhao; Shanshan Wu; Lijun Wang; Glenn Hitchman; Xia Tian; Ming Li; Li Hu; Antao Chen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.