Literature DB >> 15708205

The performance of left-handed participants on a preferential reaching test.

Carla M Mamolo1, Eric A Roy, Pamela J Bryden, Linda E Rohr.   

Abstract

Previous research in our laboratory has examined the distribution of preferred hand (PH) reaches in working space with right-handed participants. In one study, we examined the effects of tool position and task demands on the frequency of PH reaches with right-handers (Mamolo, Roy, Bryden, & Rohr, 2004). We found that PH reaches were at a maximum within ipsilateral space, and predominated within contralateral space. This was mediated by the task demands, as shown by an increased frequency of PH reaches for the more skill demanding tasks. In the current study, we tested left-handed participants on the same procedure. Five different tools were placed in an array in front of the participant, who was required to reach for, and perform one of three tasks with the tool: Lift the tool; lift and Pantomime its use; or lift and Use the tool on its corresponding object. The results showed that PH reaches were at a maximum within ipsilateral space for all three tasks. Significantly fewer PH reaches were made for tools in contralateral space. In particular, almost no PH reaches were made for the Lift task at the most extreme contralateral position. This indicates the willingness of left-handers to use their non-preferred (i.e., right) hand. One possible explanation supported by these results is that left-handers have adapted to an environment designed for right-handers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15708205     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  8 in total

1.  Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping.

Authors:  Claudia L R Gonzalez; R L Whitwell; B Morrissey; T Ganel; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Is Hand Selection Modulated by Cognitive-perceptual Load?

Authors:  Jiali Liang; Krista Wilkinson; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasping with the eyes of your hands: hapsis and vision modulate hand preference.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Shoulder position and handedness differentially affect excitability and intracortical inhibition of hand muscles.

Authors:  Shashwati Geed; Megan Grainger; Michelle L Harris-Love; Peter S Lum; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold.

Authors:  Cheol E Han; Michael A Arbib; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16

8.  "Left neglected," but only in far space: spatial biases in healthy participants revealed in a visually guided grasping task.

Authors:  Natalie de Bruin; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.