Literature DB >> 15708200

Attentional blink differences between adolescent dyslexic and normal readers.

Guy L Lacroix1, Ioana Constantinescu, Denis Cousineau, Roberto G de Almeida, Norman Segalowitz, Michael von Grünau.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the possibility that dyslexic individuals require more working memory resources than normal readers to shift attention from stimulus to stimulus. To test this hypothesis, normal and dyslexic adolescents participated in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation experiment (Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell, 1992). Surprisingly, the result showed that the participants with dyslexia produced a shallower attentional blink than normal controls. This result may be interpreted as showing differences in the way the two groups encode information in episodic memory. They also fit in a cascade-effect perspective of developmental dyslexia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15708200     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  6 in total

1.  Visual attention and reading: A test of their relation across paradigms.

Authors:  Paul T Cirino; Marcia A Barnes; Greg Roberts; Jeremy Miciak; Anthony Gioia
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2021-10-12

2.  Inducing attention not to blink: auditory entrainment improves conscious visual processing.

Authors:  Luca Ronconi; Hannah L Pincham; Dénes Szűcs; Andrea Facoetti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28

3.  Temporal variability predicts the magnitude of between-group attentional blink differences in developmental dyslexia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas A Badcock; Joanna C Kidd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Evidence for deficits in the temporal attention span of poor readers.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Encoding order and developmental dyslexia: a family of skills predicting different orthographic components.

Authors:  Cristina Romani; Effie Tsouknida; Andrew Olson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  A Psychometric Tool for a Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Approach for Dyslexia.

Authors:  Elisa Pedroli; Patrizia Padula; Andrea Guala; Maria Teresa Meardi; Giuseppe Riva; Giovanni Albani
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.