Literature DB >> 15705554

The quality of the fossil record of Mesozoic birds.

Toby M R Fountaine1, Michael J Benton, Gareth J Dyke, Robert L Nudds.   

Abstract

The Mesozoic fossil record has proved critical for understanding the early evolution and subsequent radiation of birds. Little is known, however, about its relative completeness: just how 'good' is the fossil record of birds from the Mesozoic? This question has come to prominence recently in the debate over differences in estimated dates of origin of major clades of birds from molecular and palaeontological data. Using a dataset comprising all known fossil taxa, we present analyses that go some way towards answering this question. Whereas avian diversity remains poorly represented in the Mesozoic, many relatively complete bird specimens have been discovered. New taxa have been added to the phylogenetic tree of basal birds, but its overall shape remains constant, suggesting that the broad outlines of early avian evolution are consistently represented: no stage in the Mesozoic is characterized by an overabundance of scrappy fossils compared with more complete specimens. Examples of Neornithes (modern orders) are known from later stages in the Cretaceous, but their fossils are rarer and scrappier than those of basal bird groups, which we suggest is a biological, rather than a geological, signal.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15705554      PMCID: PMC1634967          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Finding the tree of life: matching phylogenetic trees to the fossil record through the 20th century.

Authors:  M J Benton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Large-scale heterogeneity of the fossil record: implications for Phanerozoic biodiversity studies.

Authors:  A B Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision.

Authors:  Dan Graur; William Martin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Dating the tree of life.

Authors:  Michael J Benton; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Birds in a bush: five genes indicate explosive evolution of avian orders.

Authors:  Steven Poe; Alison L Chubb
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Calibration of galliform molecular clocks using multiple fossils and genetic partitions.

Authors:  Marcel van Tuinen; Gareth J Dyke
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Forelimb proportions and the evolutionary radiation of Neornithes.

Authors:  R L Nudds; G J Dyke; J M V Rayner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The fossil record and evolution: comparing cladistic and paleontologic evidence for vertebrate history.

Authors:  M A Norell; M J Novacek
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Evolutionary explosions and the phylogenetic fuse.

Authors:  A Cooper; R Fortey
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Mass survival of birds across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary: molecular evidence.

Authors:  A Cooper; D Penny
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Darwin's dilemma: the realities of the Cambrian 'explosion'.

Authors:  Simon Conway Morris
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Authors:  Tiphaine Davit-Béal; Abigail S Tucker; Jean-Yves Sire
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  A gigantic bird from the Upper Cretaceous of Central Asia.

Authors:  Darren Naish; Gareth Dyke; Andrea Cau; François Escuillié; Pascal Godefroit
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Dynamic evolution of base composition: causes and consequences in avian phylogenomics.

Authors:  Benoit Nabholz; Axel Künstner; Rui Wang; Erich D Jarvis; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Multiple nuclear genes and retroposons support vicariance and dispersal of the palaeognaths, and an Early Cretaceous origin of modern birds.

Authors:  Oliver Haddrath; Allan J Baker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Little evidence for enhanced phenotypic evolution in early teleosts relative to their living fossil sister group.

Authors:  John T Clarke; Graeme T Lloyd; Matt Friedman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Extinction rates of non-avian dinosaur species are uncorrelated with the rate of evolution of phylogenetically informative characters.

Authors:  Nicholas M A Crouch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Dinosaurs and the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution.

Authors:  Graeme T Lloyd; Katie E Davis; Davide Pisani; James E Tarver; Marcello Ruta; Manabu Sakamoto; David W E Hone; Rachel Jennings; Michael J Benton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Molecular evolution of genes in avian genomes.

Authors:  Kiwoong Nam; Carina Mugal; Benoit Nabholz; Holger Schielzeth; Jochen B W Wolf; Niclas Backström; Axel Künstner; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Andreas Heger; Chris P Ponting; David F Clayton; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Transcriptome analysis of spermatogenically regressed, recrudescent and active phase testis of seasonally breeding wall lizards Hemidactylus flaviviridis.

Authors:  Mukesh Gautam; Amitabh Mathur; Meraj Alam Khan; Subeer S Majumdar; Umesh Rai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.