Literature DB >> 1570343

Inverse protein folding problem: designing polymer sequences.

K Yue1, K A Dill.   

Abstract

We consider the question of how to design proteins. How can we find "good" amino acid sequences (i) that fold to a desired "target" structure as a native conformation of lowest accessible free energy and (ii) that will not simultaneously fold to many other conformations of the same free energy? Current protein designs often focus on helix propensities and turns. We focus here on designing the hydrophobicity. For a model of self-avoiding hydrophobic/polar chains on two-dimensional square lattices, geometric proofs and exhaustive enumerations show the following results. (i) The strategy hydrophobic residues inside/polar residues outside is not optimal. Placement of additional hydrophobic residues on the surface is often necessary. (ii) To avoid unwanted conformations, the designed sequence must have neither too many nor too few hydrophobic residues. (iii) The computational complexity of inverse folding appears to be in a different class than folding: unlike the folding problem, the design problem does not scale exponentially with chain length. Some design strategies, described here for the lattice model, produce good sequences and scale only linearly with chain length.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1570343      PMCID: PMC525653          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation.

Authors:  W KAUZMANN
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1959

2.  A thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids.

Authors:  K T O'Neil; W F DeGrado
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Side chain contributions to the stability of alpha-helical structure in peptides.

Authors:  P C Lyu; M I Liff; L A Marky; N R Kallenbach
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Dominant forces in protein folding.

Authors:  K A Dill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-08-07       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure.

Authors:  J U Bowie; R Lüthy; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Polymer principles in protein structure and stability.

Authors:  H S Chan; K A Dill
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1991

Review 7.  Design of peptides and proteins.

Authors:  W F Degrado
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1988

Review 8.  Protein design, a minimalist approach.

Authors:  W F DeGrado; Z R Wasserman; J D Lear
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes.

Authors:  J W Ponder; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility.

Authors:  B Lee; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1971-02-14       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  41 in total

1.  Modeling evolutionary landscapes: mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space.

Authors:  E Bornberg-Bauer; H S Chan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A gradient-directed Monte Carlo method for global optimization in a discrete space: application to protein sequence design and folding.

Authors:  Xiangqian Hu; David N Beratan; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Specificity versus stability in computational protein design.

Authors:  Daniel N Bolon; Robert A Grant; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evaluating and optimizing computational protein design force fields using fixed composition-based negative design.

Authors:  Oscar Alvizo; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Shape-dependent designability studies of lattice proteins.

Authors:  Myron Peto; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 2.333

6.  Modeling of the spatial structure of eukaryotic ornithine decarboxylases.

Authors:  N V Grishin; M A Phillips; E J Goldsmith
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Relative stability of de novo four-helix bundle proteins: insights from coarse grained molecular simulations.

Authors:  Giovanni Bellesia; Andrew I Jewett; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Simulations of reversible protein aggregate and crystal structure.

Authors:  S Y Patro; T M Przybycien
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Why are some proteins structures so common?

Authors:  S Govindarajan; R A Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Ribosome-mediated translational pause and protein domain organization.

Authors:  T A Thanaraj; P Argos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.