Literature DB >> 1570334

Telomere-proximal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is refractory to methyltransferase activity in vivo.

D E Gottschling1.   

Abstract

Genes located near telomeres in Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo position-effect variegation; their transcription is subject to reversible but mitotically heritable repression. This position effect and the finding that telomeric DNA is late replicating suggest that yeast telomeres exist in a heterochromatin-like state. Mutations in genes that suppress the telomeric position effect suggest that a special chromatin structure exists near chromosomal termini. Thus transcriptional repression may be explained by the inability of DNA binding proteins to access the DNA near telomeres. To test this hypothesis, the Escherichia coli Dam DNA methyltransferase, which modifies the sequence GATC, was introduced into S. cerevisiae cells. DNA sequences near the telomere were highly refractive to Dam methylation but were modified when located at positions more internal on the chromosome. Telomeric sequences were accessible to methyltransferase activity in strains that contained a mutation that suppressed the telomeric position effect. These data support the model that sequence-specific DNA binding proteins are excluded from telomere-proximal sequences in vivo and show that expression of DNA methyltransferase activity may serve as a useful tool for mapping chromosomal structural domains in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1570334      PMCID: PMC525632          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

Review 1.  Position-effect variegation after 60 years.

Authors:  S Henikoff
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  In vivo methylation of yeast DNA by prokaryotic DNA methyltransferases.

Authors:  Z Fehér; S L Schlagman; Z Miner; S Hattman
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1988-12-25       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Position effect at S. cerevisiae telomeres: reversible repression of Pol II transcription.

Authors:  D E Gottschling; O M Aparicio; B L Billington; V A Zakian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-16       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Position effect variegation in Drosophila: towards a genetics of chromatin assembly.

Authors:  J C Eissenberg
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Saccharomyces telomeres assume a non-nucleosomal chromatin structure.

Authors:  J H Wright; D E Gottschling; V A Zakian
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Modifiers of position effect are shared between telomeric and silent mating-type loci in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  O M Aparicio; B L Billington; D E Gottschling
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-09-20       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The UV excision-repair system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in the removal of methylcytosines formed in vivo by a cloned prokaryotic DNA methyltransferase.

Authors:  Z Fehér; S L Schlagman; Z Miner; S Hattman
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Expression of the Escherichia coli dam methylase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of in vivo adenine methylation on genetic recombination and mutation.

Authors:  M F Hoekstra; R E Malone
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Many yeast chromosomes lack the telomere-specific Y' sequence.

Authors:  D Jäger; P Philippsen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Sixty years of mystery.

Authors:  A C Spradling; G H Karpen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  108 in total

1.  Accessibility of transcriptionally inactive genes is specifically reduced at homeoprotein-DNA binding sites in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Carr; M D Biggin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Sir2p exists in two nucleosome-binding complexes with distinct deacetylase activities.

Authors:  S Ghidelli; D Donze; N Dhillon; R T Kamakaka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Polycomb group repression reduces DNA accessibility.

Authors:  D P Fitzgerald; W Bender
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Identification of a functional domain within the essential core of histone H3 that is required for telomeric and HM silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Thompson; Marilyn L Snow; Summer Giles; Leslie E McPherson; Michael Grunstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Telomere folding is required for the stable maintenance of telomere position effects in yeast.

Authors:  D de Bruin; S M Kantrow; R A Liberatore; V A Zakian
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Telomere structure regulates the heritability of repressed subtelomeric chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Y Park; A J Lustig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Site-selective in vivo targeting of cytosine-5 DNA methylation by zinc-finger proteins.

Authors:  Christopher D Carvin; Rebecca D Parr; Michael P Kladde
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Targeted cytosine methylation for in vivo detection of protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Christopher D Carvin; Archana Dhasarathy; Laurie B Friesenhahn; Walter J Jessen; Michael P Kladde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A genome-wide screen for Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants that affect telomere length.

Authors:  Syed H Askree; Tal Yehuda; Sarit Smolikov; Raya Gurevich; Joshua Hawk; Carrie Coker; Anat Krauskopf; Martin Kupiec; Michael J McEachern
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A novel function of the DNA repair gene rhp6 in mating-type silencing by chromatin remodeling in fission yeast.

Authors:  J Singh; V Goel; A J Klar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.