Literature DB >> 15703336

The number of functional olfactory receptor genes and the relative size of olfactory brain structures are poor predictors of olfactory discrimination performance with enantiomers.

Matthias Laska1, Daria Genzel, Alexandra Wieser.   

Abstract

The ability of four squirrel monkeys and three pigtail macaques to distinguish between nine enantiomeric odor pairs sharing an isopropenyl group at the chiral center was investigated in terms of a conditioning paradigm. All animals from both species were able to discriminate between the optical isomers of limonene, carvone, dihydrocarvone, dihydrocarveole and dihydrocarvyl acetate, whereas they failed to distinguish between the (+)- and (-)-forms of perillaaldehyde and limonene oxide. The pigtail macaques, but not the squirrel monkeys, also discriminated between the antipodes of perillaalcohol and isopulegol. A comparison of the across-task patterns of discrimination performance shows a high degree of similarity among the two primate species and also between these nonhuman primates and human subjects tested in an earlier study on the same tasks. These findings suggest that between-species comparisons of the relative size of olfactory brain structures or of the number of functional olfactory receptor genes are poor predictors of olfactory discrimination performance with enantiomers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15703336     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bji013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  17 in total

1.  Aquatic adaptations in the nose of carnivorans: evidence from the turbinates.

Authors:  Blaire Van Valkenburgh; Abigail Curtis; Joshua X Samuels; Deborah Bird; Brian Fulkerson; Julie Meachen-Samuels; Graham J Slater
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Odour character differences for enantiomers correlate with molecular flexibility.

Authors:  Jennifer C Brookes; A P Horsfield; A M Stoneham
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for a large array of enantiomers.

Authors:  M Laska; G M Shepherd
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  The frequency of occurrence of acyclic monoterpene alcohols in the chemical environment does not determine olfactory sensitivity in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Daniela Höfelmann; Diana Huber; Marie Schumacher
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth.

Authors:  John P McGann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Functional neuronal processing of human body odors.

Authors:  Johan N Lundström; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Vitam Horm       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.421

7.  Olfactory discrimination ability of South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus) for enantiomers.

Authors:  Sunghee Kim; Mats Amundin; Matthias Laska
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Central Processing of the Chemical Senses: an Overview.

Authors:  Johan N Lundström; Sanne Boesveldt; Jessica Albrecht
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.418

9.  Neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory performance.

Authors:  Johannes Frasnelli; Johan N Lundström; Julie A Boyle; Jelena Djordjevic; Robert J Zatorre; Marilyn Jones-Gotman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Design, delivery and perception of condition-dependent chemical signals in strepsirrhine primates: implications for human olfactory communication.

Authors:  Christine M Drea
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.