OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cattle testing positive for Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis as determined by microbial culture of feces or antibody ELISA were more likely to have false-positive responses on the caudal fold tuberculin (CFT) test or interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) assay for Mycobacterium bovis than cattle testing negative for M paratuberculosis. ANIMALS: 1043 cattle from 10 herds in Michigan. PROCEDURE: Feces and blood samples for plasma were collected from cattle > or =24 months old on the day the CFT test was read. Fecal samples were submitted for microbial culture for M paratuberculosis. Plasma samples were tested for antibody against M paratuberculosis, and IFN-gamma after stimulation with purified protein derivative tuberculin from M bovis or M avium. RESULTS: Of 1043 cattle, 180 (17.3%) had positive CFT test results (suspects) and 8 (0.8%) had positive IFN-gamma assay results after stimulation with purified protein derivative tuberculin from M bovis. Forty-five (4.3%) and 115 (11.0%) cattle tested positive for M paratuberculosis as determined by microbial culture of feces and antibody ELISA, respectively. Cattle with positive responses for M paratuberculosis appeared to have an increased likelihood of false-positive results on the CFT test, although this association was not significant. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: No significant association was detected among cattle testing positive for M paratuberculosis as determined by microbial culture of feces and antibody ELISA and positive CFT test and IFN-gamma assay results for M bovis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cattle testing positive for Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis as determined by microbial culture of feces or antibody ELISA were more likely to have false-positive responses on the caudal fold tuberculin (CFT) test or interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) assay for Mycobacterium bovis than cattle testing negative for M paratuberculosis. ANIMALS: 1043 cattle from 10 herds in Michigan. PROCEDURE: Feces and blood samples for plasma were collected from cattle > or =24 months old on the day the CFT test was read. Fecal samples were submitted for microbial culture for M paratuberculosis. Plasma samples were tested for antibody against M paratuberculosis, and IFN-gamma after stimulation with purified protein derivative tuberculin from M bovis or M avium. RESULTS: Of 1043 cattle, 180 (17.3%) had positive CFT test results (suspects) and 8 (0.8%) had positive IFN-gamma assay results after stimulation with purified protein derivative tuberculin from M bovis. Forty-five (4.3%) and 115 (11.0%) cattle tested positive for M paratuberculosis as determined by microbial culture of feces and antibody ELISA, respectively. Cattle with positive responses for M paratuberculosis appeared to have an increased likelihood of false-positive results on the CFT test, although this association was not significant. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: No significant association was detected among cattle testing positive for M paratuberculosis as determined by microbial culture of feces and antibody ELISA and positive CFT test and IFN-gamma assay results for M bovis.
Authors: Victor O Akinseye; Muideen D Adebayo; Oghenekaro O Genesis; Olubukola D Adelakun; Simeon I B Cadmus Journal: Trop Anim Health Prod Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 1.559
Authors: Andrew W Byrne; Jordon Graham; Craig Brown; Aoibheann Donaghy; Maria Guelbenzu-Gonzalo; Jim McNair; Robin Skuce; Adrian Allen; Stanley McDowell Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Heike Köhler; Elisabeth Liebler-Tenorio; Valerie Hughes; Karen Stevenson; Douwe Bakker; Peter Willemsen; Sylvie Bay; Christelle Ganneau; Franck Biet; H Martin Vordermeier Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2021-03-26
Authors: Robert F Kelly; Lina Gonzaléz Gordon; Nkongho F Egbe; Emily J Freeman; Stella Mazeri; Victor N Ngwa; Vincent Tanya; Melissa Sander; Lucy Ndip; Adrian Muwonge; Kenton L Morgan; Ian G Handel; Barend M de C Bronsvoort Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-07-07
Authors: Miguel Fernández; Julio Benavides; Iker A Sevilla; Miguel Fuertes; Pablo Castaño; Laetitia Delgado; J Francisco García Marín; Joseba M Garrido; M Carmen Ferreras; Valentín Pérez Journal: Vet Res Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.683
Authors: Eamonn Gormley; Mairead Doyle; Anthony Duignan; Margaret Good; Simon J More; Tracy A Clegg Journal: Vet Res Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 3.683