| Literature DB >> 21647343 |
Scott D Fitzgerald1, Steven R Bolin, Kathryn G Boland, Ailam Lim, John B Kaneene.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to retrospectively determine whether or not cattle from the state of Michigan which were classified as bovine tuberculosis reactors, based on currently approved field and laboratory testing methods, were overtly infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP). Included in this study were 384 adult cattle submitted to the Diagnostic Center for Population and Animal Health over a seven-year period. Cattle were tested utilizing standard methods to confirm that all cattle were lesion and culture negative for infection with Mycobacterium bovis at postmortem examination. Retrospective analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of ileum and ileocecal lymph node were evaluated by histopathology, acid-fast staining, and PCR assays to detect MAP. Overall, only 1.04 percent of cattle showed overt infection with MAP on visual examination of sections of ileum and/or ileo-cecal lymph node. This increased slightly to 2.1 percent of cattle likely infected with MAP after additional testing using a PCR assay. Based on these results, we found no evidence that overt infection with MAP plays a major role in the false tuberculosis reactor test results for cattle examined in this study.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21647343 PMCID: PMC3103870 DOI: 10.4061/2011/910738
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Summary of results of various screening tests for bovine tuberculosis and for results of PCR assays.
| Number of cattle tested | MAP PCR positive | Percent MAP positive | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) CFT and CCT positive | 189 | 1 | 0.5% | 0 |
| (2) CFT positive | 122 | 3 | 2.5% | 2 |
| (3) CFT negative (Control group) | 73 | 4 | 5.5% | 1 |
| Totals | 384 | 8 | 2.1% | 3 |
Summary of pathology and PCR results in MAP infected animals.
| Study group | H & E histo. result ileum | Acid -fast result ileum | H & E histo. result lymph nodea | Acid-fast result lymph nodea | MAP PCR | Breed | TB status of herd | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Primary and secondary test positive. | Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Pos. | Neg. | Jersey | Neg. |
| Group 2 | CFT Pos. | Pos. | Pos. | Pos. | Neg. | Pos. | Pos. | Jersey | Pos. |
| Group 2 | CFT Pos. | Pos. | Pos. | Pos. | Neg. | Pos. | Pos. | Holstein | Pos. |
| Group 2 | CFT Pos. | Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Pos. | Neg. | Holstein | Pos. |
| Group 3 | CFT Neg. | Pos. | Pos. | Pos. | Pos. | Pos. | Pos. | Holstein | Neg. |
| Group 3 | CFT Neg. | Neg. | Pos. | Neg. | Neg. | Pos. | Neg. | Holstein | Pos. |
| Group 3 | CFT Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Pos. | Neg. | Holstein | Pos. |
| Group 3 | CFT Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Neg. | Pos. | Neg. | Holstein | Pos. |
aLymph node was ileo-cecal lymph node.
Odds ratios for M. bovis test reactors compared to M. bovis test negative cattle, by PCR-confirmed MAP status.
| Study group | MAP PCR positive | Fisher's exact test | Odds ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number | No. of Positive | Percent | Estimate | 95% C I | ||
| (1) Primary and secondry test reactors | 189 | 1 | 0.5 | .0511 | 0.11 | 0.01–1.06 |
| (2) CFT reactor | 122 | 3 | 2.5 | .4281 | 0.43 | 0.09–2.00 |
| Groups 1 and 2 combined | 311 | 4 | 1.3 | .0458 | 0.22 | 0.05–0.92 |
*Fisher's exact test compares the difference in the odds ratios between the bovine TB test group in that row verses the bovine TB test negative group.