Literature DB >> 15702601

A linear mixed-effects calibration in qualifying experiments.

Jason J Z Liao1.   

Abstract

In many applications, controls are used to monitor the process or experiment and to assess whether the process is in control or the experiment is valid. In this case, the traditional fixed-effects calibration is usually not adequate, but a mixed-effects model is appropriate. In this article, a linear mixed-effects calibration model is considered to qualify an experiment. Two estimating methods for the controls based on maximum likelihood and restricted maximum likelihood are proposed. The bias and mean squared error performances are studied by simulation. Five different methods to construct confidence intervals for the controls are compared. A dataset is used to demonstrate the advantages of the mixed-effects model.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15702601     DOI: 10.1081/bip-200040800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  3 in total

1.  Treatment of batch in the detection, calibration, and quantification of immunoassays in large-scale epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Neil J Perkins; Paul S Albert; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Combining Biomarker Calibration Data to Reduce Measurement Error.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Jennifer Weck; Sunni L Mumford; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Emily M Mitchell; Anna Z Pollack; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  A Method and On-Line Tool for Maximum Likelihood Calibration of Immunoblots and Other Measurements That Are Quantified in Batches.

Authors:  Steven S Andrews; Suzannah Rutherford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.