Literature DB >> 15702372

A creatine transporter is operative at the brush border level of the rat jejunal enterocyte.

M Tosco1, A Faelli, C Sironi, G Gastaldi, M N Orsenigo.   

Abstract

Although ergogenic effects and health benefits have been reported for creatine used as nutritional supplement, to date little is known about the mechanism of creatine absorption in the small intestine. Thus the current study was undertaken to elucidate the mechanism of creatine intake in rat jejunum with the use of well-purified brush border membrane vesicles, isolated from jejunal enterocyte. Creatine uptake was found markedly stimulated by inwardly directed Na(+) and Cl(- )gradients, potential-sensitive, strongly reduced by the substitution of Na(+) and Cl(-) with various cations and anions and positively affected by intravesicular K(+). Moreover, creatine uptake is: 1) significantly inhibited by creatine structural analogs, 2) abolished by low concentrations of 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate hydrobromide (MTSEA), 3) saturable as a function of creatine concentration with an apparent Michaelis-Menten constant of 24.08 +/- 0.80 muM and a maximal velocity of 391.30 +/- 6.19 pmoles mg protein(-1) 30 s(-1). The transport is electrogenic since at least two Na(+) and one Cl(-) are required to transport one creatine molecule. Western blot analysis showed the same amount of creatine transport protein in the jejunal apical membrane when compared to ileum. Thus, these data demonstrate the existence of a Na(+)- and Cl(-)-dependent, membrane potential-sensitive, electrogenic carrier-mediated mechanism for creatine absorption in rat jejunal apical membrane vesicles, which is biochemically and pharmacologically similar to those observed in other tissues. However, in other cell types the stimulatory effect of intravesicular K(+) was never detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15702372     DOI: 10.1007/s00232-004-0721-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Membr Biol        ISSN: 0022-2631            Impact factor:   1.843


  37 in total

1.  Identification of a testis-expressed creatine transporter gene at 16p11.2 and confirmation of the X-linked locus to Xq28.

Authors:  G S Iyer; R Krahe; L A Goodwin; N A Doggett; M J Siciliano; V L Funanage; R Proujansky
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  The basolateral membrane of rat enterocyte: its purification from brush border contamination.

Authors:  M N Orsenigo; M Tosco; G Esposito; A Faelli
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Sodium/proton antiport in brush-border-membrane vesicles isolated from rat small intestine and kidney.

Authors:  H Murer; U Hopfer; R Kinne
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1976-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Creatine uptake, metabolism, and efflux in human monocytes and macrophages.

Authors:  J D Loike; M Somes; S C Silverstein
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1986-07

Review 5.  Creatine: biosynthesis, regulation, and function.

Authors:  J B Walker
Journal:  Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol       Date:  1979

6.  Creatine transporter and mitochondrial creatine kinase protein content in myopathies.

Authors:  M A Tarnopolsky; A Parshad; B Walzel; U Schlattner; T Wallimann
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 7.  Creatine and the creatine transporter: a review.

Authors:  R J Snow; R M Murphy
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.396

8.  Human, rat and chicken small intestinal Na+ - Cl- -creatine transporter: functional, molecular characterization and localization.

Authors:  M J Peral; M García-Delgado; M L Calonge; J M Durán; M C De La Horra; T Wallimann; O Speer; A Ilundáin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Health implications of creatine: can oral creatine supplementation protect against neurological and atherosclerotic disease?

Authors:  Markus Wyss; Andreas Schulze
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  New creatine transporter assay and identification of distinct creatine transporter isoforms in muscle.

Authors:  Bernd Walzel; Oliver Speer; Ernie Boehm; Søren Kristiansen; Sharon Chan; Kierian Clarke; Joseph P Magyar; Erik A Richter; Theo Wallimann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.310

View more
  6 in total

1.  Jejunal creatine absorption: what is the role of the basolateral membrane?

Authors:  M N Orsenigo; A Faelli; S De Biasi; C Sironi; U Laforenza; M Paulmichl; M Tosco
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  The effects of dietary β-guanidinopropionic acid on growth and muscle fiber development in juvenile red porgy, Pagrus pagrus.

Authors:  Dalon P White; Bradley L Baumgarner; Wade O Watanabe; Md Shah Alam; Stephen T Kinsey
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 3.  X-linked creatine transporter deficiency: clinical aspects and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Jiddeke M van de Kamp; Grazia M Mancini; Gajja S Salomons
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Effects of N-linked glycosylation on the creatine transporter.

Authors:  Nadine Straumann; Alexandra Wind; Tina Leuenberger; Theo Wallimann
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Effects of creatine in a rat intestinal model of ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  M N Orsenigo; C Porta; C Sironi; U Laforenza; G Meyer; M Tosco
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Maternal creatine homeostasis is altered during gestation in the spiny mouse: is this a metabolic adaptation to pregnancy?

Authors:  Stacey J Ellery; Domenic A LaRosa; Michelle M Kett; Paul A Della Gatta; Rod J Snow; David W Walker; Hayley Dickinson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.