Literature DB >> 15701616

Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fresh-frozen, nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Bernard R Bach1, Kirk J Aadalen, Michael G Dennis, Dominic S Carreira, John Bojchuk, Jennifer K Hayden, Charles A Bush-Joseph.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting reports of allograft performance, immune response, tissue incorporation, and rerupture rates when used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of a fresh-frozen, nonirradiated, patellar tendon allograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Patients who underwent endoscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue a minimum of 2 years ago were evaluated with physical examinations, the KT-1000 arthrometer, functional testing, radiographic evaluation, subjective assessment, and outcomes tools.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (60 knees) were evaluated at an average of 51 months after surgery. Ninety-four percent of patients were mostly or completely satisfied. A negative pivot shift test result was noted in 90% of subjects. The KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side differences were < or =3 mm in 95% of patients, and no patient exceeded 5 mm. The mean International Knee Documentation Committee score was 78 (SD = 19), and the mean Lysholm score was 82 (SD = 17). There were no clinical symptoms consistent with graft rejection or infection. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated infrequent significant tunnel widening.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a fresh-frozen, nonirradiated allograft for primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament is a successful procedure both subjectively and functionally for restoring stability in patients selected for allograft reconstruction. In the patients selected for this surgical procedure, clinical, arthrometric stability testing, and subjective satisfaction were comparable to our previously published cohort studies using patellar tendon autograft at similar postoperative follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15701616     DOI: 10.1177/0363546504267347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  15 in total

1.  The extracellular remodeling of free-soft-tissue autografts and allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a comparison study in a sheep model.

Authors:  M Dustmann; T Schmidt; I Gangey; F N Unterhauser; A Weiler; S U Scheffler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  What Factors Influence the Biomechanical Properties of Allograft Tissue for ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Drew A Lansdown; Andrew J Riff; Molly Meadows; Adam B Yanke; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Peri-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction femur fracture: a biomechanical analysis of the femoral tunnel as a stress riser.

Authors:  Yung Han; Zeeshan Sardar; Scott McGrail; Thomas Steffen; Paul A Martineau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using achilles tendon allograft: an assessment of outcome for patients age 30 years and older.

Authors:  Eric L Chehab; Kyle R Flik; Armando F Vidal; Michael Levinson; Robert A Gallo; David W Altchek; Russell F Warren
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-09-21

5.  Comparison of Achilles and tibialis anterior tendon allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Ji-Hoon Bae; Hong-chul Lim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Two to five year results of primary ACL reconstruction using doubled tibialis anterior allograft.

Authors:  Martyn Snow; Gregory Campbell; Jay Adlington; William D Stanish
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Is there significant variation in the material properties of four different allografts implanted for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  David Penn; Thomas L Willet; Mark Glazebrook; Martyn Snow; William D Stanish
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Chadwick Prodromos; Brian Joyce; Kelvin Shi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 4.114

9.  Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft versus autograft.

Authors:  Xiujiang Sun; Jianfeng Zhang; Xiaoyi Qu; Yanping Zheng
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jeffrey Wilde; Asheesh Bedi; David W Altchek
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.