Literature DB >> 15700197

Relation of stent overexpansion to the angiographic no-reflow phenomenon in intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction.

Yuichiro Maekawa1, Yasushi Asakura, Toshihisa Anzai, Shiro Ishikawa, Teruo Okabe, Tsutomu Yoshikawa, Satoshi Ogawa.   

Abstract

The angiographic no-reflow phenomenon is observed in some patients during stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We attempted to clarify the influence of stent overexpansion and plaque morphology on the angiographic no-reflow phenomenon in AMI patients who underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stent implantation. We assessed the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade in the coronary angiographic findings, and quantitative and qualitative IVUS findings, in a total of 90 patients who underwent IVUS-guided stenting for AMI. The patients were divided into two groups according to the stent-to-artery ratio: overexpansion group (ratio > or =1.2) and non-overexpansion group (ratio <1.2). Angiographic no-reflow (defined as TIMI flow grade <3) in stent implantation was observed in 15 patients (17%). Angiographic no-reflow was more frequently observed in the overexpansion group than in the non-overexpansion group (32% vs 11%, P = 0.0312). Patients with no-reflow had more lipid pool-like images or fissure/dissection than those without. In the overexpansion group, a lipid pool-like image and fissure/dissection were more frequently observed in patients with no-reflow. The rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) in the overexpansion group was significantly lower than that in the non-overexpansion group during the follow-up period (10% vs 18%, P = 0.0476), but the incidence of pump failure in the overexpansion group was higher than that in the non-overexpansion group during the hospital course (28% vs 14%, P = 0.0358). Stent overexpansion in AMI patients is related to a higher incidence of angiographic no-reflow, especially if the lesion has a lipid pool-like image or fissure/dissection, although there is a tendency for lower TLR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15700197     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-004-0798-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of optimum stent deployment by stent boost imaging: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tanaka; Nico H J Pijls; Jacques J Koolen; Kees-Joost Botman; Herman R Michels; Bart R G Brueren; Kathinka Peels; Naohisa Shindo; Jun Yamashita; Akira Yamashina
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Differential effects of post-dilation after stent deployment in patients presenting with and without acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Zhi-Jiang Zhang; Oscar C Marroquin; Roslyn A Stone; Joel L Weissfeld; Suresh R Mulukutla; Faith Selzer; Kevin E Kip
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Impact of tissue protrusion after coronary stenting in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Okuya; Yuichi Saito; Yoshiaki Sakai; Iwao Ishibashi; Yoshio Kobayashi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  The role of fibrinolytic system in no-reflow after stenting with and without predilation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: fibrinolysis and no-reflow after coronary stenting.

Authors:  Sabri Demircan; Mustafa Yazici; Cavid Hamiseyev; Gunnur Demircan; Sevinc Sultansuyu; Erdogan Yasar; Mahmut Sahin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Contrast agent dose and slow/no-reflow in percutaneous coronary interventions : A case-control study of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  S Ding; Y Shi; X Sun; Q Cao; H Dai; J Guan
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Intravascular ultrasound observation of the mechanism of no-reflow phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Junxia Li; Longmei Wu; Xinli Tian; Jian Zhang; Yujie Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Shock Index on Admission Is Associated with Coronary Slow/No Reflow in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Qingcheng Wang; Huimin Shen; Huijuan Mao; Fenghua Yu; Haiqing Wang; Jianlei Zheng
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Microvascular and Prognostic Effect in Lesions With Different Stent Expansion During Primary PCI for STEMI: Insights From Coronary Physiology and Intravascular Ultrasound.

Authors:  Xida Li; Shuo Sun; Demou Luo; Xing Yang; Jingguang Ye; Xiaosheng Guo; Shenghui Xu; Boyu Sun; Youti Zhang; Jianfang Luo; Yingling Zhou; Shengxian Tu; Haojian Dong
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-09

9.  Effects of no-reflow phenomenon on ventricular systolic synchrony in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Le Wang; Gang Liu; Jun Liu; Mingqi Zheng; Liang Li
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.423

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.