Literature DB >> 15699673

Cranial bone grafting for orbital reconstruction: is it still the best?

Christopher P Kelly1, Adam J Cohen, Reha Yavuzer, Ian T Jackson.   

Abstract

A variety of etiologies may result in functional and aesthetic deficiencies requiring orbital reconstruction. These are discussed, as are some of the possible repair techniques. In the current study, a randomized, retrospective chart review of one surgeon's experience with orbital reconstruction using cranial bone grafts was performed. The results of the chart reviews are presented, including preoperative diagnosis, clinical signs and symptoms, and postoperative findings. This study allowed a comparison and contrast to be made between exogenous materials and autogenous bone for orbital reconstruction. The differences between cranial and iliac bone as autogenous sources of reconstructive material were examined. The study indicates that cranial bone grafting for reconstruction of the orbit remains the material of choice.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15699673     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200501000-00039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  10 in total

1.  Titanium preformed implants in orbital floor reconstruction - case presentation, review of literature.

Authors:  Bogdan Banica; Patricia Ene; Daniela Vranceanu; Razvan Ene
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2013-03

2.  Computer-assisted analysis of anatomical relationships of the ethmoidal foramina and optic canal along the medial orbital wall.

Authors:  Servet Celik; Mehmet Asim Ozer; Zuhal Kazak; Figen Govsa
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Customized orbital floor soft tissue retractor.

Authors:  Anshul Rai; Shashwat Magarkar; Abhay Datarkar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-07-03

4.  Orbital floor fractures: a retrospective review of 45 cases at a tertiary health care center.

Authors:  Chun H Rhim; Thomas Scholz; Ara Salibian; Gregory R D Evans
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2010-03

5.  Three-dimensional evaluation of the danger zone of ethmoidal foramens on the frontoethmoidal suture line on the medial orbital wall.

Authors:  Zuhal Kazak; Servet Celik; Mehmet Asim Ozer; Figen Govsa
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Navigational area of the cranio-orbital foramen and its significance in orbital surgery.

Authors:  Servet Celik; Zuhal Kazak; Mehmet Asim Ozer; Figen Govsa
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 7.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications.

Authors:  Ivan Vladislavov Panayotov; Valérie Orti; Frédéric Cuisinier; Jacques Yachouh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Spheno-orbital Reconstruction after Meningioma Resection.

Authors:  Michael B Pritz; Richard A Burgett
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2009-03

Review 9.  The Role of Computer-Assisted Technology in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction: A PRISMA-driven Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kelvin H Wan; Kelvin K L Chong; Alvin L Young
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures: perspective and practices of nigerian surgeons.

Authors:  O A Akadiri
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2012-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.