Literature DB >> 15698971

Good practice in consent.

Richard W I Cooke1.   

Abstract

Informed parental consent reminds the health professional to respect parent autonomy with respect to their infant's health care. It involves at least four elements: information, assessment of understanding, assessment of capacity, and freedom to choose. Critical issues are training of staff, timing of approach, and quality and presentation of information. In the newborn period, additional problems include parental distress and competence, consent for research into emergency treatments (exceptions to this are proposed below); screening for future disease, circumcision and withdrawing intensive care are considered as special cases. Variation in practice and policies in European neonatal units is described.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15698971     DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2004.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1744-165X            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Parental views on informed consent for expanded newborn screening.

Authors:  Louise Moody; Kubra Choudhry
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Comparison of underlying factors behind parental refusal or consent for lumbar puncture.

Authors:  Hassib Narchi; Ghassan Ghatasheh; Noura Al Hassani; Layla Al Reyami; Qudsiya Khan
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 3.  Communication-related allegations against physicians caring for premature infants.

Authors:  J Nguyen; H Muniraman; M Cascione; R Ramanathan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy.

Authors:  Emanuelle Pessa Valente; Ilaria Mariani; Benedetta Covi; Marzia Lazzerini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Fifteen-minute consultation: an evidence-based approach to research without prior consent (deferred consent) in neonatal and paediatric critical care trials.

Authors:  Kerry Woolfall; Lucy Frith; Angus Dawson; Carrol Gamble; Mark D Lyttle; Bridget Young
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.309

6.  A qualitative feasibility study to inform a randomised controlled trial of fluid bolus therapy in septic shock.

Authors:  Caitlin B O'Hara; Ruth R Canter; Paul R Mouncey; Anjali Carter; Nicola Jones; Simon Nadel; Mark J Peters; Mark D Lyttle; David A Harrison; Kathryn M Rowan; David Inwald; Kerry Woolfall
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  How parents and practitioners experience research without prior consent (deferred consent) for emergency research involving children with life threatening conditions: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Kerry Woolfall; Lucy Frith; Carrol Gamble; Ruth Gilbert; Quen Mok; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Doing challenging research studies in a patient-centred way: a qualitative study to inform a randomised controlled trial in the paediatric emergency care setting.

Authors:  Kerry Woolfall; Bridget Young; Lucy Frith; Richard Appleton; Anand Iyer; Shrouk Messahel; Helen Hickey; Carrol Gamble
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  How experience makes a difference: practitioners' views on the use of deferred consent in paediatric and neonatal emergency care trials.

Authors:  Kerry Woolfall; Lucy Frith; Carrol Gamble; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.