Literature DB >> 1569892

A method for assessing the impact of a computer-based decision support system on health care outcomes.

R A Bankowitz1, J R Lave, M A McNeil.   

Abstract

The wide variation in utilization of diagnostic resources has not been decreased by the proliferation of new diagnostic technologies. We wish to test the hypothesis that the introduction of a medical decision support system into clinical practice could potentially lead to more efficient use of diagnostic information, and therefore lead to a reduction in overall laboratory use and cost of care. We have devised and are currently implementing a randomized controlled trial of a computer based decision support system, the University of Pittsburgh version of Quick Medical Reference (QMR). The main purpose of the study is to determine the effect of the QMR program on specific outcome measures: length of hospital stay, number and types of diagnostic tests ordered, and overall charges. An important part of this evaluation is relating the initial level of diagnostic uncertainty expressed by the admitting housestaff team to utilization of diagnostic resources. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology for carrying out this controlled trial, and to describe our initial experiences with its implementation.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1569892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  8 in total

1.  Influence of case and physician characteristics on perceptions of decision support systems.

Authors:  E S Berner; R S Maisiak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Effects of a decision support system on physicians' diagnostic performance.

Authors:  E S Berner; R S Maisiak; C G Cobbs; O D Taunton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Comparative impact of guidelines, clinical data, and decision support on prescribing decisions: an interactive web experiment with simulated cases.

Authors:  Vitali Sintchenko; Enrico Coiera; Jonathan R Iredell; Gwendolyn L Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-10-05       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Measuring the impact of diagnostic decision support on the quality of clinical decision making: development of a reliable and valid composite score.

Authors:  Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Ritika R Kapoor; Michael Coren; Vasantha Nanduri; Amanda L Tomlinson; Paul M Taylor; Jeremy C Wyatt; Joseph F Britto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Relationships among performance scores of four diagnostic decision support systems.

Authors:  E S Berner; J R Jackson; J Algina
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Effects of a decision support system on the diagnostic accuracy of users: a preliminary report.

Authors:  A S Elstein; C P Friedman; F M Wolf; G Murphy; J Miller; P Fine; P Heckerling; T Miller; J Sisson; S Barlas; K Biolsi; M Ng; X Mei; T Franz; A Capitano
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Medical diagnostic decision support systems--past, present, and future: a threaded bibliography and brief commentary.

Authors:  R A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  A Survey on Ambient Intelligence in Health Care.

Authors:  Giovanni Acampora; Diane J Cook; Parisa Rashidi; Athanasios V Vasilakos
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 10.961

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.