Literature DB >> 15697231

Virtual screening against highly charged active sites: identifying substrates of alpha-beta barrel enzymes.

Chakrapani Kalyanaraman1, Katarzyna Bernacki, Matthew P Jacobson.   

Abstract

We have developed a virtual ligand screening method designed to help assign enzymatic function for alpha-beta barrel proteins. We dock a library of approximately 19,000 known metabolites against the active site and attempt to identify the relevant substrate based on predicted relative binding free energies. These energies are computed using a physics-based energy function based on an all-atom force field (OPLS-AA) and a generalized Born implicit solvent model. We evaluate the ability of this method to identify the known substrates of several members of the enolase superfamily of enzymes, including both holo and apo structures (11 total). The active sites of these enzymes contain numerous charged groups (lysines, carboxylates, histidines, and one or more metal ions) and thus provide a challenge for most docking scoring functions, which treat electrostatics and solvation in a highly approximate manner. Using the physics-based scoring procedure, the known substrate is ranked within the top 6% of the database in all cases, and in 8 of 11 cases, it is ranked within the top 1%. Moreover, the top-ranked ligands are strongly enriched in compounds with high chemical similarity to the substrate (e.g., different substitution patterns on a similar scaffold). These results suggest that our method can be used, in conjunction with other information including genomic context and known metabolic pathways, to suggest possible substrates or classes of substrates for experimental testing. More broadly, the physics-based scoring method performs well on highly charged binding sites and is likely to be useful in inhibitor docking against polar binding sites as well. The method is fast (<1 min per ligand), due largely to an efficient minimization algorithm based on the truncated Newton method, and thus, it can be applied to thousands of ligands within a few hours on a small Linux cluster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15697231     DOI: 10.1021/bi0481186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  30 in total

Review 1.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Devleena M Shivakumar; Sarah E Boyce; Matthew P Jacobson; David A Case; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 4.  Leveraging structure for enzyme function prediction: methods, opportunities, and challenges.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Suwen Zhao; Boxue Tian
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  Fragment-guided design of subnanomolar β-lactamase inhibitors active in vivo.

Authors:  Oliv Eidam; Chiara Romagnoli; Guillaume Dalmasso; Sarah Barelier; Emilia Caselli; Richard Bonnet; Brian K Shoichet; Fabio Prati
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Outcome of a workshop on applications of protein models in biomedical research.

Authors:  Torsten Schwede; Andrej Sali; Barry Honig; Michael Levitt; Helen M Berman; David Jones; Steven E Brenner; Stephen K Burley; Rhiju Das; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Roland L Dunbrack; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andras Fiser; Adam Godzik; Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Christine Humblet; Matthew P Jacobson; Andrzej Joachimiak; Stanley R Krystek; Tanja Kortemme; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Gaetano T Montelione; John Moult; Diana Murray; Roberto Sanchez; Tobin R Sosnick; Daron M Standley; Terry Stouch; Sandor Vajda; Max Vasquez; John D Westbrook; Ian A Wilson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Development and binding mode assessment of N-[4-[2-propyn-1-yl[(6S)-4,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-(hydroxymethyl)-4-oxo-3H-cyclopenta[g]quinazolin-6-yl]amino]benzoyl]-l-γ-glutamyl-D-glutamic acid (BGC 945), a novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor that targets tumor cells.

Authors:  Anna Tochowicz; Sean Dalziel; Oliv Eidam; Joseph D O'Connell; Sarah Griner; Janet S Finer-Moore; Robert M Stroud
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Computation-facilitated assignment of the function in the enolase superfamily: a regiochemically distinct galactarate dehydratase from Oceanobacillus iheyensis .

Authors:  John F Rakus; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Alexander A Fedorov; Elena V Fedorov; Fiona P Mills-Groninger; Rafael Toro; Jeffrey Bonanno; Kevin Bain; J Michael Sauder; Stephen K Burley; Steven C Almo; Matthew P Jacobson; John A Gerlt
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Improving the species cross-reactivity of an antibody using computational design.

Authors:  Christopher J Farady; Benjamin D Sellers; Matthew P Jacobson; Charles S Craik
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Computational evaluation of factors governing catalytic 2-keto acid decarboxylation.

Authors:  Di Wu; Dajun Yue; Fengqi You; Linda J Broadbelt
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 1.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.