Literature DB >> 15697224

Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins.

Christopher J Oldfield1, Yugong Cheng, Marc S Cortese, Celeste J Brown, Vladimir N Uversky, A Keith Dunker.   

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins and regions carry out varied and vital cellular functions. Proteins with disordered regions are especially common in eukaryotic cells, with a subset of these proteins being mostly disordered, e.g., with more disordered than ordered residues. Two distinct methods have been previously described for using amino acid sequences to predict which proteins are likely to be mostly disordered. These methods are based on the net charge-hydropathy distribution and disorder prediction score distribution. Each of these methods is reexamined, and the prediction results are compared herein. A new prediction method based on consensus is described. Application of the consensus method to whole genomes reveals that approximately 4.5% of Yersinia pestis, 5% of Escherichia coli K12, 6% of Archaeoglobus fulgidus, 8% of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, 23% of Arabidopsis thaliana, and 28% of Mus musculus proteins are mostly disordered. The unexpectedly high frequency of mostly disordered proteins in eukaryotes has important implications both for large-scale, high-throughput projects and also for focused experiments aimed at determination of protein structure and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15697224     DOI: 10.1021/bi047993o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  184 in total

Review 1.  Allosteric modulators of steroid hormone receptors: structural dynamics and gene regulation.

Authors:  Raj Kumar; Iain J McEwan
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Understanding protein non-folding.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-02-01

4.  Organism complexity anti-correlates with proteomic beta-aggregation propensity.

Authors:  Gian Gaetano Tartaglia; Riccardo Pellarin; Andrea Cavalli; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Nanoimaging for protein misfolding and related diseases.

Authors:  Yuri L Lyubchenko; Simon Sherman; Luda S Shlyakhtenko; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  Dynamic interactions between clathrin and locally structured elements in a disordered protein mediate clathrin lattice assembly.

Authors:  Yue Zhuo; Udayar Ilangovan; Virgil Schirf; Borries Demeler; Rui Sousa; Andrew P Hinck; Eileen M Lafer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Mining alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition features with cross species sequence alignments.

Authors:  Yugong Cheng; Christopher J Oldfield; Jingwei Meng; Pedro Romero; Vladimir N Uversky; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 8.  Protein aggregation processes: In search of the mechanism.

Authors:  Carl Frieden
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 9.  The importance of being flexible: the case of basic region leucine zipper transcriptional regulators.

Authors:  Maria Miller
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 10.  Intrinsically disordered features of carbonic anhydrase IX proteoglycan-like domain.

Authors:  Emma Langella; Martina Buonanno; Giuseppina De Simone; Simona Maria Monti
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.