Literature DB >> 15696768

The effect of vernal keratoconjunctivitis on clinical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.

Sait Egrilmez1, Sevinc Sahin, Ayse Yagci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although good visual results and low complication rates are commonly reported following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in eyes with keratoconus, the outcome of PKP in eyes with keratoconus and concomitant vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) has not been well documented. We performed a study to compare the outcome and relative risk factors of PKP for keratoconus with and withoutVKC.
METHODS: Review of the medical records of all patients who underwent PKP for keratoconus at a university-affiliated hospital in Izmir,Turkey, from Nov. 1, 1991, to Jan. 31, 2002. Only eyes that had been followed for at least 18 months postoperatively were included in the study. Twenty-three eyes of 19 patients (14 males and 5 females) had keratoconus with VKC, and 65 eyes of 57 patients (33 males and 24 females) had keratoconus alone. We compared clinical outcomes and complications between the two groups.
RESULTS: The mean length of follow-up was 34.0 months (standard deviation [SD] 16.3 months) (range 18-67 months) in the eyes with comitant VKC and 41.0 (SD 19.8) months (range 18-98 months) in the eyes with keratoconus alone. During the follow-up period, 2.35 (SD 1.90) suture-removal sessions for loosened sutures were performed in the eyes with VKC, compared with 1.34 (SD 1.69) sessions in the eyes with keratoconus alone (p = 0.016). Steroid-induced glaucoma developed in two eyes (8.7%) in theVKC group and in three eyes (4.6%) in the keratoconus-alone group (p = 0.603); the rates of steroid-induced cataract were four (17.4%) and two (3.1%) respectively (p = 0.038). The average final best-corrected visual acuity was 20/22 (range 20/50 to 20/20) in the eyes with VKC and 20/23 (range 20/60 to 20/20) in the eyes with keratoconus alone.
INTERPRETATION: The clinical outcome of PKP in eyes with keratoconus and VKC is comparable to that in eyes with keratoconus alone. However, because complications such as prematurely loosened sutures and steroid-induced cataract are more common in the coexistence of VKC, closer monitoring is necessary in these cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15696768     DOI: 10.1016/s0008-4182(04)80072-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus eyes with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Seyed-Mohamadmehdi Moshtaghion; Mohammad Abolhosseini
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-28

2.  Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Keratoconic Patients with versus without Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Fatemeh Javadi; Mohammad Reza Jafarinasab
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

3.  Tube shunt coverage with gamma-irradiated cornea allograft (VisionGraft).

Authors:  Feyzahan Ekici; Marlene R Moster; Victor Cvintal; Wanda D Hu; Michael Waisbourd
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-04

Review 4.  Ocular allergy and keratoconus.

Authors:  Namrata Sharma; Kavita Rao; Prafulla K Maharana; Rasik B Vajpayee
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  Relevance of IgE, allergy and eye rubbing in the pathogenesis and management of Keratoconus.

Authors:  Prerna Ahuja; Zelda Dadachanji; Rohit Shetty; Sowmya Arudi Nagarajan; Pooja Khamar; Swaminathan Sethu; Sharon D'Souza
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.