Literature DB >> 15696047

Noncontrast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging vs lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymph circulation disorders: A comparative study.

Ningfei Liu1, Chenguang Wang, Minghua Sun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Visualization of the lymphatic vessels is a challenge in patients with disorders of the lymphatic circulation. In an effort to improve the diagnostic scope of lymphatic imaging, we compared traditional lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D MRI).
METHODS: From October 1, 2002, to May 30, 2004, 39 patients (27 males and 12 females) with lower extremity lymphedema and/or skin lymphorrhea in the abdominal wall or the external genitalia underwent LSG and 3D MRI. Patients' ages ranged from 3 to 71 years. Assessment of the imaging studies included the degree and quality of visualization of the malformations of the lymphatic collectors, lymphatic trunks, lymph nodes, and tissue edema.
RESULTS: In patients with lymphedema, chylous reflux syndrome, or both, LSG depicted the enlarged lymphatics and nodes as a fused band or mass. In 3D MRI, the dilated superficial lymphatic collectors and deep lymphatic trunks, as well as the accumulation of chyle and node enlargements, were clearly visualized. In patients with hypoplasia or aplasia of the lymphatics, LSG usually displayed the pattern of dermal backflow in the form of radiotracer filling of the dermal lymphatics or stagnation of the isotope at the injection point. The images obtained by 3D MRI were able to demonstrate the extent of tissue fluid accumulation and distinguish edema fluid from subcutaneous fat.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with peripheral and central lymphatic malformations, LSG provided images representative of the function of the lymphatic vessels but failed to give detailed information regarding its anatomy. 3D MRI provided extensive information on the anatomy of the lymph stagnated vasculature as well as on the effects of lymphatic dysfunction on local structures and tissue composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15696047     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  8 in total

Review 1.  New diagnostic modalities in the evaluation of lymphedema.

Authors:  Thomas F O'Donnell; John C Rasmussen; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2017-01-16

2.  Assessment of lymphatic impairment and interstitial protein accumulation in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema using CEST MRI.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Paula C M Donahue; Swati Rane; Christopher R Thompson; Megan K Strother; Allison O Scott; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Primary lower limb lymphoedema: classification with non-contrast MR lymphography.

Authors:  Lionel Arrivé; S Derhy; B Dahan; S El Mouhadi; L Monnier-Cholley; Y Menu; C Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Lymphatic mapping and lymphedema surgery in the breast cancer patient.

Authors:  Ketan M Patel; Oscar Manrique; Michael Sosin; Mahjabeen Aftab Hashmi; Poysophon Poysophon; Robert Henderson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 5.  Emerging lymphatic imaging technologies for mouse and man.

Authors:  Eva M Sevick-Muraca; Sunkuk Kwon; John C Rasmussen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Regional Patterns of Fluid and Fat Accumulation in Patients with Lower Extremity Lymphedema Using Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

Authors:  Joseph H Dayan; Itay Wiser; Richa Verma; Jody Shen; Nishi Talati; Debra Goldman; Babak J Mehrara; Mark L Smith; Erez Dayan M D; Michelle Coriddi M D; Alexander Kagan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.169

7.  Analysis of case series of milky urine: A single center and departmental clinical experience with emphasis on management perspectives: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Sham Sunder; Rajesh Jayaraman; Himanshu Sekhar Mahapatra; Satyanand Sathi; K Venkataramanan; K Prabhu; Anurag Gupta; Suman Sethi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2014-10

Review 8.  Chyloptysis with chylopericardium, a rare case and mini-review.

Authors:  Xuming Luo; Zhuhua Zhang; ShiQiang Wang; XianDong Gu; Xiongbiao Wang
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.317

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.