Literature DB >> 15695418

Continuous quality improvement as an innovation: which nursing facilities adopt it?

Judith A Lucas1, Tamara Avi-Itzhak, Joanne P Robinson, Catherine G Morris, Mary Jane Koren, Susan C Reinhard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We identify environmental and organizational predictors that best discriminate between formal continuous quality improvement (CQI) adopters and nonadopters in nursing homes (NHs) and create a diagnostic profile for facility administrators and policy makers to promote CQI. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of licensed NH administrators in New Jersey in 1999, using The Nursing Care Quality Improvement Survey ( Zinn, Weech, & Brannon, 1998) and The New Jersey NH Profiles Chart. We also performed a discriminant analysis. Of 350 NHs, 46% returned completed questionnaires.
RESULTS: Using variance innovation, resource dependence, and institutional perspectives for our framework, we found that new requirements, environmental competition, organizational time and structural facilitators, and manager training made statistically significant contributions to discriminating between formal CQI adopters and nonadopters. IMPLICATIONS: Regardless of size, NHs adopt formal CQI to meet external expectations of new regulations and accreditation criteria. CQI adoption is facilitated by information systems, flexible use of personnel, and team supports, as well as CQI training for managers. This profile of adopters can guide administrators and policy makers in promoting CQI for NHs, and it can help NHs already interested in CQI focus internal resources on key facilitators.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15695418     DOI: 10.1093/geront/45.1.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  9 in total

1.  Regulation and mindful resident care in nursing homes.

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Donde Plowman; Donald Bailey; Kirsten Corazzini; Queen Utley-Smith; Natalie Ammarell; Mark Toles; Ruth Anderson
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-05-17

Review 2.  The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Patrick W Brady; Michele C Dritz; David K Hooper; W Matthew Linam; Craig M Froehle; Peter Margolis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 3.  Improving the quality of long-term care with better information.

Authors:  Vincent Mor
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Organizational and environmental determinants of hospital EMR adoption: a national study.

Authors:  Abby Swanson Kazley; Yasar A Ozcan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Daily practice teams in nursing homes: evidence from New York state.

Authors:  Helena Temkin-Greener; Shubing Cai; Paul Katz; Hongwei Zhao; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-03-18

6.  The role of motivation in the diffusion of innovations in Canada's long-term care sector: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lauren MacEachern; Lisa Cranley; Janet Curran; Janice Keefe
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2020-09-24

7.  The Impact of Market Conditions on RN Staffing in Hospitals: Using Resource Dependence Theory and Information Uncertainty Perspective.

Authors:  Dong Yeong Shin; Robert Weech-Maldonado; Jongwha Chang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-10-13

8.  High Medicaid Nursing Homes: Organizational and Market Factors Associated With Financial Performance.

Authors:  Robert Weech-Maldonado; Justin Lord; Rohit Pradhan; Ganisher Davlyatov; Neeraj Dayama; Shivani Gupta; Larry Hearld
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Determinants of Successful Nursing Home Accreditation.

Authors:  Shu-Chuan Yeh; Shwu-Feng Tsay; Wen Chun Wang; Ying-Ying Lo; Hon-Yi Shi
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.