Literature DB >> 15695180

The Necker cube--an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing.

Jürgen Kornmeier1, Michael Bach.   

Abstract

How can our percept spontaneously change while the observed object stays unchanged? This happens with ambiguous figures, like the Necker cube. Explanations favor either bottom-up factors in early visual processing, or top-down factors near awareness. The EEG has a high temporal resolution, so event related potentials (ERPs) may help to throw light on these alternative explanations. However, the precise point in time of neural correlates of perceptual reversal is difficult to estimate. We developed a paradigm that overcomes this problem and found an early (120 ms) occipital ERP signal correlated with endogenous perceptual reversal. Parallels of ambiguous-figure-reversal to binocular-rivalry-reversals are explored.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15695180     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  26 in total

1.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Juliane Britz; Michael A Pitts; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural substrates of perceptual integration during bistable object perception.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Antigona Martínez; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Binocular rivalry: frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Jens Sommer; Andreas Jansen; Marnix Naber; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Synchronous and opposite roles of the parietal and prefrontal cortices in bistable perception: a double-coil TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Anna-Katharine Brem; Faranak Farzan; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Neural generators of ERPs linked with Necker cube reversals.

Authors:  Michael A Pitts; Antígona Martínez; Clea Stalmaster; Janice L Nerger; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Magnetoencephalographic activity related to conscious perception is stable within individuals across years but not between individuals.

Authors:  Kristian Sandberg; Gareth Robert Barnes; Geraint Rees; Morten Overgaard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  On the role of attention in binocular rivalry: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Urte Roeber; Sandra Veser; Erich Schröger; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The advantage of ambiguity? Enhanced neural responses to multi-stable percepts correlate with the degree of perceived instability.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Increased readiness for adaptation and faster alternation rates under binocular rivalry in children.

Authors:  Mariann Hudak; Patricia Gervan; Björn Friedrich; Alexander Pastukhov; Jochen Braun; Ilona Kovacs
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Insights from intermittent binocular rivalry and EEG.

Authors:  Michael A Pitts; Juliane Britz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.