Literature DB >> 15693843

Prevention, detection, and management of early bacterial and fungal infections in a preclinical cardiac xenotransplantation model that achieves prolonged survival.

Sumeet S Teotia1, Randall C Walker, Johannes M Schirmer, Henry D Tazelaar, Marian G Michaels, Jack M Risdahl, Guerard W Byrne, John S Logan, Christopher G A McGregor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We analyzed bacterial and fungal infectious complications in a cohort of 16 consecutive experiments with the longest surviving cardiac xenografts to date.
METHODS: Transgenic, porcine-to-baboon, heterotopic (abdomen) cardiac xenotransplantation was performed in 16 consecutive experiments, using rapamycin, tacrolimus, corticosteroids, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, and an alpha-Gal-PEG polymer, as immunosuppression. Prophylactic anti-microbials included i.v. trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, oral ganciclovir/valganciclovir, and oral itraconazole. An episode of bacterial infection was defined as a positive blood and/or wound culture with: leukocytosis, fever >101.5 degrees F, and/or clinical deterioration.
RESULTS: Mean graft survival was 71 +/- 29 days; the longest was 113 days. There were 23 episodes of bacterial infection; 14 resolved with treatment. The mean time to the first episode of infection was 44 +/- 21 days (n=12). Eight of 16 deaths were due to infection: two bacterial-only, two cytomegalovirus (CMV) only, four both bacterial and CMV, and none fungal. The frequency of infection was 1, 2.8, and 1.8 episodes/100 survival days, respectively, for animals whose grafts survived for 30 to 59, 60 to 89, and >90 days. CMV infection (reviewed in detail in a separate communications) was due to baboon CMV, and was associated with low serum levels of ganciclovir.
CONCLUSION: In a cardiac xenograft model that achieved prolonged (>3 months) survival, bacteremia was common, but usually reversible, and fungal infection was prevented with prophylaxis. The level of immunosuppression required to achieve clinically meaningful xenograft survival is associated with a level of bacterial and fungal infectious complications that is manageable and similar to the early clinical experiences in human transplantation. Further research will determine if the viral infectious complications observed in these experiments can be reduced by optimizing blood levels of anti-viral prophylaxis and monitoring viral polymerase chain reaction levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15693843     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2005.00205.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenotransplantation        ISSN: 0908-665X            Impact factor:   3.907


  9 in total

1.  The utility of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy for the diagnosis of xenograft rejection after CD46 pig-to-baboon cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Davide Ricci; Henry D Tazelaar; Naoto Miyagi; Vinay P Rao; Rachel A Pedersen; Walter K Kremers; Guerard W Byrne; Christopher G A McGregor
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  B cell phenotypes in baboons with pig artery patch grafts receiving conventional immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamamoto; Qi Li; Hidetaka Hara; Liaoran Wang; Hongmin Zhou; Juan Li; Devin E Eckhoff; A Joseph Tector; Edwin C Klein; Ray Lovingood; Mohamed Ezzelarab; David Ayares; Yi Wang; David K C Cooper; Hayato Iwase
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 1.708

3.  Surgical and nonsurgical complications of a pig to baboon heterotopic heart transplantation model.

Authors:  P C Corcoran; K A Horvath; A K Singh; R F Hoyt; M L Thomas; M A Eckhaus; M M Mohiuddin
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 4.  The role of genetically engineered pigs in xenotransplantation research.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser; Jagdeece Ramsoondar; Carol Phelps; David Ayares
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 5.  Current status of xenotransplantation and prospects for clinical application.

Authors:  Richard N Pierson; Anthony Dorling; David Ayares; Michael A Rees; Jörg D Seebach; Jay A Fishman; Bernhard J Hering; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 6.  Porcine to Human Heart Transplantation: Is Clinical Application Now Appropriate?

Authors:  Christopher G A McGregor; Guerard W Byrne
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.818

7.  Intra-Abdominal Heterotopic Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Laura DiChiacchio; Avneesh K Singh; Joshua L Chan; Nicole M Shockcor; Tianshu Zhang; Billeta G Lewis; David Ayares; Philip Corcoran; Keith A Horvath; Muhammad M Mohiuddin
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-07-25

Review 8.  Preventing transfer of infectious agents.

Authors:  Joachim Denner; Nicolas J Mueller
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 9.  Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Progress in Preclinical Models and Prospects for Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Avneesh K Singh; Corbin E Goerlich; Aakash M Shah; Tianshu Zhang; Ivan Tatarov; David Ayares; Keith A Horvath; Muhammad M Mohiuddin
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.782

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.