Literature DB >> 15692349

The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients.

Patrick B Garvey1, Edward W Buchel, Barbara A Pockaj, Richard J Gray, Thomas D Samson.   

Abstract

The authors retrospectively reviewed the computerized records of 71 women undergoing 80 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions after mastectomy over a 1-year period. There were 33 normal, 26 overweight, and 12 obese patients. No statistically significant difference in flap complications was found between groups. Overall fat necrosis rates were 11.4 percent for the normal-weight patients, 6.7 percent for the overweight patients, and 6.7 percent for the obese patients. Postoperative hospital time was similar for all groups. The occurrence of abdominal wall fascial laxity was uncommon and similar for all groups. Large (>900 g) reconstructions were completed without prohibitive complications in the reconstruction flap. The DIEP flap represents a significant advance in autologous breast tissue reconstruction. Although concerns regarding fat necrosis rates in DIEP flaps have been voiced, the authors did not see an increasing rate of fat necrosis in their overweight and obese patients, and their overall rate of fat necrosis is comparable to rates reported for free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. Also, increasing body mass index did not seem to affect the rate of delayed complications of the abdominal wall, such as abdominal wall hernia or bulging. Although it was not statistically significant, the authors did observe a trend toward increased wound-healing complications with increasing body mass index. Their data also support the claim that the complete sparing of the rectus abdominis muscles afforded by the DIEP flap avoids abdominal wall fascial bulging or defects often seen in obese TRAM reconstruction patients. Because flap and wound complication rates are similar or superior to those of other autologous tissue reconstruction techniques and the occurrence of abdominal wall defects is all but eliminated, the DIEP flap likely represents the preferred autologous breast reconstruction technique for overweight and obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15692349     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000149588.09148.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  12 in total

1.  Violation of the rectus complex is not a contraindication to component separation for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Patrick B Garvey; Chad M Bailey; Donald P Baumann; Jun Liu; Charles E Butler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  A comparison of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Leigh Jansen; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku P Stat
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

3.  The Impact of Obesity on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Nikhil Sobti; Aadit Patel; Evan Matros; Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph H Dayan; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Robert J Allen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 5.  Clinical Approaches to Breast Reconstruction: What Is the Appropriate Reconstructive Procedure for My Patient?

Authors:  Max Dieterich; Adrian Dragu; Angrit Stachs; Johannes Stubert
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Spontaneous rupture of abdominal wall after breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flap following mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun Iwabu; Tsutomu Namikawa; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Kazune Fujisawa; Toyokazu Oki; Maho Ogawa; Natsuko Iwai; Akiko Yano; Motone Kuriyama; Takeki Sugimoto; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-31

7.  The Impact of Delaying Breast Reconstruction on Patient Expectations and Health-Related Quality of Life: An Analysis Using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Alexander Morzycki; Joseph Corkum; Nadim Joukhadar; Osama Samargandi; Jason G Williams; Simon G Frank
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 8.  Is obesity a predisposing factor for free flap failure and complications? Comparison between breast and nonbreast reconstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Yong Shin; Si-Gyun Roh; Nae-Ho Lee; Kyung-Moo Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The Type of Breast Reconstruction May Not Influence Patient Satisfaction in the Chinese Population: A Single Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Benlong Yang; Lin Li; Wenhui Yan; Jiaying Chen; Ying Chen; Zhen Hu; Guangyu Liu; Zhenzhou Shen; Zhimin Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Optimizing aesthetic outcomes for breast reconstruction in patients with significant macromastia or ptosis.

Authors:  Wojciech Dec
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2018-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.