Literature DB >> 15692331

Energy costs of physical activities in children and adolescents.

Joanne S Harrell1, Robert G McMurray, Christopher D Baggett, Michael L Pennell, Patricia F Pearce, Shrikant I Bangdiwala.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary aim was to determine the energy expenditure (EE: kcal.kg(-1).h(-1)) in terms of caloric cost and metabolic equivalents of activities commonly performed by children and adolescents. Secondary aims were to determine at what age and pubertal developmental stage values approach those of adults.
METHODS: In this descriptive study, 295 volunteer youth 8-18 yr of age completed 18 common physical activities (including rest) while EE was measured continuously with a portable metabolic system. Three sets of activities were assigned in random order for each subject. Activities ranged from television viewing and video game play to running and rope skipping. Pubertal development was estimated from a self-report questionnaire.
RESULTS: At rest, VO(2) and EE were highest in the youngest children and decreased with advancing age and higher pubertal stage in both genders. The age-adjusted and puberty-adjusted energy expenditure values were generally lower than the compendium MET values for sedentary and moderate activities but were more varied for high-intensity activities. However, the ratio of activity EE to REE was comparable in children and adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Energy expenditure per kilogram of body mass at rest or during exercise is greater in children than adults and varies with pubertal status, thus using the definition of a MET in the compendium of physical activities without adjustment is inadequate for energy estimation in children, until a child reaches Tanner Stage 5. However, the ratio of activity EE to resting EE in children appears to be similar or slightly less than in the compendium, suggesting that the compendium MET increments used with our adjusted EE values more closely approximate the true EE of activities in children than present adult norms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15692331     DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000153115.33762.3f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  93 in total

1.  System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures.

Authors:  Thomas L McKenzie; Deborah A Cohen; Amber Sehgal; Stephanie Williamson; Daniela Golinelli
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2006-02

2.  Measuring Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Bonny Rockette-Wagner; Kristi L Storti; Sharon Edelstein; Linda M Delahanty; Bryan Galvin; Alexandra Jackson; Andrea M Kriska
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  Exceptional Reported Effects and Data Anomalies Merit Explanation from "A randomized controlled trial of coordination exercise on cognitive function in obese adolescents" by.

Authors:  Keisuke Ejima; Stephanie L Dickinson; Andrew W Brown; Jack A Yanovski; Kathryn A Kaiser; Kevin D Hall; Steven B Heymsfield; David B Allison
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2019-10-20

4.  Physical activities in adolescent girls: variability in energy expenditure.

Authors:  Karin A Pfeiffer; Kathryn H Schmitz; Robert G McMurray; Margarita S Treuth; David M Murray; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Physical activity and BMI in a nationally representative sample of children and adolescents.

Authors:  Arlene E Chung; Asheley Cockrell Skinner; Michael J Steiner; Eliana M Perrin
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  The contribution of upper limb and total body movement to adolescents' energy expenditure whilst playing Nintendo Wii.

Authors:  Lee E F Graves; Nicola D Ridgers; Gareth Stratton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  A new method to estimate energy expenditure from abdominal and rib cage distances.

Authors:  S Gastinger; H Sefati; G Nicolas; A Sorel; A Gratas-Delamarche; J Prioux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Neighborhood park use by children: use of accelerometry and global positioning systems.

Authors:  Genevieve Fridlund Dunton; Estela Almanza; Michael Jerrett; Jennifer Wolch; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Ankle Accelerometry for Assessing Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls: Threshold Determination, Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility.

Authors:  Erin R Hager; Margarita S Treuth; Candice Gormely; LaShawna Epps; Soren Snitker; Maureen M Black
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Development and testing of the BONES physical activity survey for young children.

Authors:  Christina D Economos; Erin Hennessy; Jennifer M Sacheck; M Kyla Shea; Elena N Naumova
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.