Literature DB >> 15689860

Posterior mini-incision technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft harvest.

Chadwick C Prodromos1, Yung S Han, Brett L Keller, Richelle J Bolyard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study presents a new approach to hamstring graft harvest. The hypothesis tested was that this approach, the posterior mini-incision technique, would result in (1) consistent semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (Gr) tendon identification, (2) consistent identification and sectioning of the accessory semitendinosus tendon, (3) virtual elimination of the risk of cutting hamstring grafts short, (4) excellent safety, and (5) a small anterior incision with excellent cosmesis. TYPE OF STUDY: Surgical technique.
METHODS: Two-hundred three consecutive primary hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions were performed in skeletally mature patients using this technique. Of these, 185 were located and 175 were clinically evaluated. Follow-up was 24 to 113 months. Ninety patients completed a brief cosmesis questionnaire. Seven fresh-frozen knees were dissected. The locations of the ST and Gr tendons were identified in the popliteal fossa along a medial-to-lateral axis for purposes of incision placement. The location of the accessory ST was documented and the distance from the posterior incision to the popliteal artery was measured.
RESULTS: There were no complications referable to graft harvest. No tendon was cut short. The posterior graft harvest mini-incision and the anterior tibial fixation/tibial tunnel mini-incisions were each usually about 1 inch in length. Cosmesis evaluation showed that 80% of patients thought their incisions looked better than the incisions of others they had seen who had had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. None thought them worse. Cosmesis was important to a majority of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The posterior mini-incision technique facilitated safe, rapid hamstring graft harvest and virtually eliminated the risk of cutting tendons short. Cosmesis was excellent, and was important to patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15689860     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

1.  Hamstring graft fixation in MPFL reconstruction at the patella using a transosseous suture technique.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Shivanand Chikale; Nico Sartory; Nawid Hariri; Sven Feil; Hans H Pässler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft link: graft preparation technique.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2012-08-31

3.  Minimally invasive posterior hamstring harvest.

Authors:  Trent J Wilson; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-08-16

4.  Double-Bundle, All-Inside Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Technique Using 2 Separate Autologous Grafts.

Authors:  Roy A G Hoogeslag; Bart W Oudelaar; Rianne Huis In't Veld; Reinoud W Brouwer
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-09-26

5.  The rule of twos: Technical note on consistent anatomical landmarks for hamstring graft harvesting.

Authors:  Lei Jiang; Tay Kaesian; Andrew Tan Hwee Chye
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-06

6.  Can we predict the size of frequently used autografts in ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Philip Zakko; Carola F van Eck; Daniel Guenther; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The impact of sensory deficits after harvesting hamstrings autograft for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Torbjørn Strand; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Posterior Approach With Small Incision Is a Safe Alternative to Anterior Approach for Hamstring Autograft Harvest in Adolescents.

Authors:  Alexandra H Aitchison; Lindsay M Schlichte; Madison R Heath; Peter D Fabricant; Daniel W Green
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2022-03-25

9.  All-Inside, All-Epiphyseal Autograft Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in the Skeletally Immature Athlete.

Authors:  Peter D Fabricant; Moira M McCarthy; Frank A Cordasco; Daniel W Green
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2013-05-08

10.  How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Authors:  Cynthia A Kahlenberg; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Richard A Ferraro; William W Schairer; Michael E Steinhaus; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.