Literature DB >> 15688193

Hormonal growth-promotant effects on grain-fed cattle maintained under different environments.

J B Gaughan1, W M Kreikemeier, T L Mader.   

Abstract

Six steers (3/4 Charolaisx1/4 Brahman) (mean body weight 314+/-27 kg) and six spayed heifers (3/5 Shorthornx2/5 Red Angus) (mean body weight 478+/-30 kg) were used to determine the effects of climatic conditions and hormone growth promotants (HGP) on respiration rate (RR; breaths/min), pulse rate (beats/min), rectal temperature (RT; degrees C), and heat production (HP; kJ). Cattle were exposed to the following climatic conditions prior to implantation with a HGP and then again 12 days after implantation: 2 days of thermoneutral conditions (TNL) [21.9+/-0.9 degrees C ambient temperature (T(A)) and 61.7+/-22.1% relative humidity (RH)] then 2 days of hot conditions [HOT; 29.2+/-4 degrees C (T(A)) and 78.3+/-13.2% (RH)], then TNL for 3 days and then 2 days of cold conditions [COLD; 17.6+/-0.9 degrees C (T(A)) and 63.4+/-1.8% (RH); cattle were wet during this treatment]. The HGP implants used were: estrogenic implant (E), trenbolone acetate implant (TBA), or both (ET). Both prior to and following administration of HGP, RRs were lower (P<0.05) on cold days and greater (P<0.05) on hot days compared to TNL. On hot days, RTs, were 0.62 degrees C higher after compared to before implanting. Across all conditions, RTs were >0.5 degrees C greater (P<0.05) for E cattle than for TBA or ET cattle. On cold days, RTs of steers were >0.8 degrees C higher than for the heifers, while under TNL and HOT, RTs of steers were 0.2-0.35 degrees C higher than those of heifers. Prior to implantation, HP per hour and per unit of metabolic body weight was higher (P<0.05) for cattle exposed to hot conditions, when compared to HP on cold days. After implantation, HP was greater (P<0.05) on hot days than on cold days. Under TNL, ET cattle had the lowest HP and greatest feed intake. On hot days, E cattle had the lowest HP, and the highest RT; therefore, if the potential exists for cattle death from heat episodes, the use of either TBA or ET may be preferred. Under cold conditions HP was similar among implant groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15688193     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-005-0254-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  18 in total

1.  Shade and wind barrier effects on summertime feedlot cattle performance.

Authors:  T L Mader; J M Dahlquist; G L Hahn; J B Gaughan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Strategies to reduce feedlot cattle heat stress: effects on tympanic temperature.

Authors:  M S Davis; T L Mader; S M Holt; A M Parkhurst
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Cold-induced changes in breathing pattern as a strategy to reduce respiratory heat loss.

Authors:  D A Diesel; A Tucker; D Robertshaw
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-12

4.  Reduction of energy requirements of steers fed on low-quality-roughage diets using trenbolone acetate.

Authors:  R A Hunter; J E Vercoe
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Heat production of cattle acclimated to cold, thermoneutrality and heat when exposed to thermoneutrality and heat stress.

Authors:  J B Robinson; D R Ames; G A Milliken
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Thyroid activity and heat production in cattle following sudden ambient temperature changes.

Authors:  M K Yousef; H H Kibler; H D Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effect of implant sequence and dose on feedlot cattle performance.

Authors:  T L Mader
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Temperature-induced changes in metabolism and body weight of cattle (Bos taurus).

Authors:  B A Young
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Wind protection effects and airflow patterns in outside feedlots.

Authors:  T L Mader; J M Dahlquist; J B Gaughan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Effect of sequential implanting with Synovex on steer and heifer performance.

Authors:  T L Mader; J M Dahlquist; M H Sindt; R A Stock; T J Klopfenstein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Heat Load on Cattle.

Authors:  Angela M Lees; Veerasamy Sejian; Andrea L Wallage; Cameron C Steel; Terry L Mader; Jarrod C Lees; John B Gaughan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Feedlot Factors Influencing the Incidence of Dark Cutting in Australian Grain-Fed Beef.

Authors:  Cameron C Steel; Angela M Lees; Garth Tarr; Frank R Dunshea; Des Bowler; Frances Cowley; Robyn D Warner; Peter McGilchrist
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.231

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.